MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794821874 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby018.1038

S251. QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS IN THE LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP

2018· article· en· W2794821874 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diego Mendes, Gustavo Mustafé, Thalita Fernandes, Thaí­s Nogueira de Oliveira Martins, Clarissa de Rosalmeida Dantas

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMental Health Treatment and Access
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuality of life (healthcare)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicineContext (archaeology)PsychiatryGlobal Assessment of FunctioningDepression (economics)ClozapineOutpatient clinicBipolar disorderSocial functioningMoodInternal medicineDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In recent years the goal of the treatment of patients with schizophrenia has shifted from symptom remission to the improvement in health as a whole. In this context, concepts such as quality of life (QoL), social and occupational functioning gained interest. The aim of this study is to investigate changes in QoL of chronic schizophrenia patients in the long-term follow-up and their associations with symptoms and level of community functioning. We will contact 85 patients with schizophrenia, considered clinically stable in the previous year, who participated in a study about the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia in 2009/2010. Back then, they were recruited in two sites: an outpatient service of a university general hospital (49 patients) and a community-based service (36 patients). Patients will be assessed with the same instruments adopted in the first study: SAPS, SANS, Calgary Depression Scale and Quality of Life Scale (QLS), plus the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), not used at baseline. We started recruitment by the patients originally treated in the outpatient clinic. Until now, of the 49 patients, 2 dropped out treatment, 8 had been transferred to other services, 5 refused to participate, 1 had the diagnostic changed to bipolar disorder and 3 had died precociously. Of the deaths, 1 was due to complications secondary to the use of clozapine, 1 due to suicide and 1 patient was murdered by another patient during a psychiatric hospitalization. Up to now, 20 patients completed reassessment, mean age at baseline was 36.9 ± 8.9 years, mean duration of mental illness was 16 ± 10.1 years, and 75% were men. They had in mean, 10.7 ± 3.3 years of education, only 4 had any work activity and 55% had a low socioeconomic position. Assessment interval was 6.9 years ± 0.5. Some demographic aspects slightly worsened: only 15% had an occupation at follow-up, and 60% fell in the lower socioeconomic position. Between assessments, 8 (40%) patients have had periods of noncompliance to medication, 5 had psychiatric hospitalizations, three of them involuntarily. At follow-up 70% of the patients were using clozapine and, despite that, some presented residual positive symptoms (SAPS 6.2 ± 4.8); Calgary mean score was low (2.2 ± 2.2) and, except for the patient who died, there was no new suicide attempts between assessments. Negative symptoms severity was moderate in general (mean SANS 14.8 ± 7.2). Patients as a group had no significant change in QLS scores (61.5 ± 28.2 versus 60.1 ± 28.2 at follow-up). However, 15% of patients had an improvement greater than 20% in their QLS scores, and 30% had a worsening of their scores greater than 20%. Baseline scores on SANS (p=0.005), SAPS (p=0.03) and number of hospitalizations (p=0.03) were negatively correlated with follow-up QLS scores; and years of schooling at baseline was positively correlated (p=0.2). Baseline QLS scores were strongly associated with current QLS scores, as well as with PSP scores (both with P <0.000) at follow-up. Regarding PSP outcomes, 50% of patients were classified in the 70-31 interval (disabilities of various degrees) and 25% were under 30, requiring intensive support. The results presented are partial, obtained with a provisional small sample size. Nevertheless, they show some interesting trends as the possible existence of two patterns of outcome regarding QoL in chronic schizophrenia patients: of significant improvement and one of worsening. If those initial findings are to be confirmed, our next step will be to investigate characteristics associated to improvement or deterioration of QoL in spite of a relative stability of symptoms. That sort of information is of great relevance in the pursuit of recovery for schizophrenia patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchizophrenia BulletinMême sujetMental Health Treatment and AccessTravaux en français237 207