MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794905793 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby017.640

F109. BOUNDARIES BETWEEN DEFICIT AND NONDEFICIT SCHIZOPHRENIA: LONG TERM STABILITY AND OUTCOMES

2018· article· en· W2794905793 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gustavo Mustafé, Diego Mendes, Thaí­s Nogueira de Oliveira Martins, Thalita Fernandes, Clarissa de Rosalmeida Dantas

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychopathologyQuality of life (healthcare)PsychologyPsychiatryCognitionClinical psychologyMedicinePsychotherapist

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are admittedly associated with a poorer outcome regarding aspects such as functionality, quality of life and cognitive performance. Patients with prominent, persistent and primary negative symptoms have been considered to manifest a putative subtype called “Deficit schizophrenia” (DS). However, the boundaries of deficit and nondeficit forms were put in question since the publication of a study that considered separately a group of patients with persistent negative symptoms whose primary nature could not be asserted, the “ambiguous nondeficit” group, who would be otherwise categorized as nondefict according to the gold standard instrument: the Schedule for the Assessment of the Deficit Syndrome (SDS). Those patients presented psychopathological features, quality of life, insight and cognitive function quite different from the nondeficit group, and closer to the deficit group. The objectives of the present study are to investigate the stability of the categorization regarding the presence of DS in three groups: “deficit”(DS), “nondeficit” (ND) and “ambiguous nondeficit” (SND) over a long term follow-up and to evaluate clinical outcomes in the different groups. We will contact 85 patients with schizophrenia, considered clinically stable in the previous year, who participated in a study about the DS in 2009/2010. Back then, they were recruited in two sites: an outpatient service of a university general hospital (49 patients) and a community-based mental health service (36 patients). Patients will be assessed with the same instruments adopted in the first study: a questionnaire for clinical and demographic information; BPRS, SAPS, SANS, Calgary Depression Scale, the SDS, QLS, and a battery of neurocognitive tests. We started the recruitment by the patients originally treated in the outpatient clinic. Here we present partial results. Of the 49 patients, 5 refused to participate in the follow-up study, 3 died prematurely, and 1 had the diagnostic changed for bipolar disorder. Assessment interval was 6.9 years ± 0.5 Among the 20 reassessed patients, mean age at baseline was 36.9 ± 8.9 years, mean duration of mental illness was 16 ± 10.1 years, and 75% were men. They had in mean, 10.7 ± 3.3 years of education, only 20% had any work activity, 15% were married and 55% had a low socioeconomic position. These demographic aspects slightly worsened: only 15% had an occupation at follow-up, and 60% fell in the lower socioeconomic position. Regarding the SDS classification, 4 of 9 ND patients at the baseline were reclassified as DS; 1 of 7 DS was reclassified as ND, the other 6 remained DS; from the AND, 3 were considered DS and 1 ND, from a total of 4. At the end, there were 13 DS and 7 ND, while at the baseline they were: 7 DS, 9 ND and 4 AND. Concerning psychopathology, 80% of the patients had an increase in SANS and the most expressive increase was in nondeficit group (an average of 5.4 points), although the average in DS group remained the higher (18.9 points). Still, SAPS and Calgary remained low in all three subgroups, with a mean of 6.20 and 2.20 points, respectively. As to medication, 70% of the baseline were in use of Clozapine (67% of ND, 57% of DS and 100% of the AND group) and that total number remained the same during the follow up. Our preliminary results are derived from a small sample. Although we cannot draw definite conclusion, these outcomes suggest trends that are worth observing: the worsening of negative symptoms among patients and the tendency of conversion to DS group, especially among the “ambiguous” group. This advocates against the dichotomous division of deficit and nondeficit schizophrenia and speaks in favor of a dimensional understanding of negative symptoms.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchizophrenia BulletinMême sujetAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTravaux en français237 207