MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2795081890 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby018.851

S64. EXECUTIVE FUNCTION OF CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS IN A SEVEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

2018· article· en· W2795081890 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thalita Fernandes, Thaí­s Nogueira de Oliveira Martins, Gustavo Mustafé, Diego Mendes, Luiz Fernando Pegoraro, Clarissa De Rosalmei Dantas

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Executive functionsPsychiatryMedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyCognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are generalized, but memory and executive dysfunction represent the more robust impairments and are strongly associated with adverse social and occupational outcomes. Those deficits are present in all phases of the disease, but their course, particularly in the chronic phase, is less clear. The aim of this study is to investigate changes in the performance of chronic schizophrenia patients in tests of executive function over a seven-year test-retest period. We will contact 85 patients with schizophrenia, considered clinically stable in previous year, who participated in a study about the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia in 2009–2010. Back then, they were recruited in two sites: an outpatient service of a general hospital (49 patients) and a community-based mental health service for patients with severe mental illness (36 patients), both in Campinas, Brazil. Patients will be reassessed with the same instruments adopted in the first study: SAPS; SANS; Calgary Depression Scale (CDS); Quality of Life Scale (QLS) and a battery of tests comprising Verbal Fluency Tasks; Digit Span Forward (DSF) and Backward (DSB) and Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Additionally, we included three instruments: PSP, for social functioning; Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and London Tower Test (LTT), for executive functions. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare executive performance at baseline and at follow-up. Linear regression was used to test associations between variables. We started the recruitment by the patients originally treated in the outpatient clinic. We present in this poster partial results. Among the 20 patients re-interviewed the mean age at baseline was 36.9 ± 8.9 years, mean duration of mental illness was 16 ± 10.1 years, 75% were men. They had in mean, 10.7 ± 3.3 years of education, only 20% had any work activity, and 15% were married. Mean length of test-retest interval was 6.9 years (minimum 6 and maximum 7.7). At follow-up, 4 patients had improved their education, but only 3 (15%) had any work activity. Up to now 19 patients completed the cognitive reassessment. We performed a principal components factor analysis (PCA) including DSB, TMT-B and VFT for both baseline and follow-up assessments. PCA yielded a single factor for the set of tests in both assessments, which we named Executive Factor, accounting for 57% of variance in baseline and 51.38% in the follow-up assessment. Factor scores were calculated and then compared: 7 patients had higher scores on Executive Factor in the follow-up and 10 had worse scores but differences were not significant. In the linear regression analysis, we did not find significant associations between performance in executive functions in the follow-up assessment and clinical and psychopathological variables neither at the baseline nor at the follow-up assessment. In the Wisconsin test, approximately 60% of the patients managed to form only up to 01 category, which is considered a bad performance. The mean score in LTT was 57.3 ± 10.6 for movements and 170.4 ± 125.2 for time. The results presented are partial, obtained with a provisional small sample size but they show some interesting trends. In general, there was a group tendency for a slightly worse performance after 7 years of the baseline assessment, but we could identify two groups of patients who differ from that general tendency: one with marked deterioration and one with improvement of executive performance over time. If those initial findings are to be confirmed, our next step will be to investigate characteristics associated to improvement or deterioration of executive performance. That sort of information is of great relevance in the pursuit of recovery for schizophrenia patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchizophrenia BulletinMême sujetPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesTravaux en français237 207