Implementing a Field Pilot Project for Selective Polymer Injection in Different Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Polymer-flood projects with selective polymer injection in different reservoirs within the same injector well has never been a simple task, but it can be achieved. This work explains how. During secondary recovery in several reservoirs (contacted by vertical wells), selective installation at injector wells enables vertical distribution wherever convenient (i.e: reservoirs with a high oil saturation, lower injected poral volumes); such distribution in Polymer-flood projects was not possible since some reservoirs were not completely or effectively swept. A new deep well selective injection system has been developed to be used in multiple reservoirs while preserving viscosity of the polymer solution without mechanical degradation. Thus, injection is increased in those reservoirs with hydrocarbon potential with a low admission of polymer or no admission at all. This device is installed in the well bottom (patent still pending) and has side-pocket mandrels with valves operated by the conventional Slick Line rig. Through the different positions of these valves, the desired flow in each reservoir can be achieved. We are going to introduce the work developed in lab and field pilot in order to prove this development is technically feasible. Different tests have been performed in test benches designed to that purpose, the equipment was manufactured and this new tool was installed in some injector wells. The tool was installed in two polymer injector wells. Reservoirs tests had been previously performed to evaluate injectivity, mainly to dismiss problems (high pressure, skin factor or lack of continuity in the reservoirs). Afterwards, valve combination to achieve target injection rate in each reservoir was defined. This pilot experience was held with a service company in the polymer project located in the Diadema field in the San Jorge Gulf Basin Argentina. The field is operated by CAPSA, an Argentine oil operator with 480 producers and 270 injector wells The reservoir flooded with polymer is characterized by high permeability (500 md average), high heterogeneity (10 to 5000 md), high porosity (30%), very layered sand layers (4 to 12 m net thickness), poorlateral continuity (fluvial origin) and oil of 20° API (100 cp at reservoir conditions). The permeability and reservoir pressure in the reservoirs led us to develop a system with a selective admission and no polymer degradation. The Polymer flooding in Diadema started in October 2007 using 5 injectors (it nowadays includes 35 injectors) with an injection rate of 1000 m3d (it is 3300 m3d today). Polymer solution used produced water (16000 ppm TDS brine) and 2500 ppm of HPAM (22 MDa average molecular weight) reaching to 70 cp of average viscosity of fluid injection. This device enables a regulated polymer solution admission into those reservoirs where it was scarce or inexistent, thus improving injected pore volumes, increasing RF, an economic return, and resulting in the massification of the polymer-flood project.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».