MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2795927739 · doi:10.1177/1474515117741892

Why is ethnicity important in cardiovascular care?

2018· editorial· en· W2795927739 sur OpenAlexaff
Chantal F. Ski, David R. Thompson, Donna Fitzsimons, Kathryn King‐Shier

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2018
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEthnic groupIntensive care medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past few decades advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have resulted in marked reductions in age- and sex-adjusted mortality.1 Regardless, CVD continues to exact a disproportionate toll on several ethnic and racial groups, and for many these disparities have grown in magnitude over time with generally smaller improvements seen in minority groups.2,3 Numerous complex factors have contributed to what is often referred to as the ‘treatment gap’ between ethnic and non-ethnic populations,4–6 the majority of which can be categorized into three levels: patient, health-care system and environmental.4,7 At the patient level there are distinct and well-established differences in CVD risk factor profiles that place ethnic groups at higher risk. For example, for decades blood pressure has been significantly higher for African-Americans with an earlier onset of hypertension compared with their White counterparts,8 South Asians tend to have a disproportionate burden of diabetes and more harmful types of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and less helpful types of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with those with European ancestry,2 and a disproportionate prevalence of diabetes, up to six time higher, in Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks and non-Hispanic Asians compared with non-Hispanic Whites.2 Further compounding the issue is the significant atypical presentation of cardiac symptoms in ethnic groups such as African-American, Asian, South Asian and Hispanic.9 Also at the patient level, cultural norms, values and practices contribute to increased risk of CVD. For example, individual health behaviours such as exercise and diet (e.g. high concentration of oil and ghee used in Indian diets),10 illness beliefs that result in poor symptom recognition,11 poor health literacy which contributes to medication non-adherence,12 and social and family structure that impacts on timeliness to seek and act on professional advice.11 At the health system level cultural competency plays a key role. For example, unintentional bias stemming from inadequate knowledge and sensitivity to cultural differences of patients from ethnic backgrounds can lead to differential treatment and referral patterns.4 Not only do ethnic groups experience limited access to care in general,13 they face more barriers to CVD diagnosis,14,15 lower rates of cardiac intervention4 and overall lower quality health care.16 Additionally, ethnic groups have a higher prevalence of unrecognized CVD risk factors that remain untreated, resulting in higher morbidity and mortality.7 To ensure delivery of culturally appropriate cardiovascular care, providers should be aware of their own cultural values and beliefs, and develop a cultural repertoire that enables them to engage effectively with diversity and promote culturally sensitive care.17 Other notable variables at the health systems level include higher-quality facilities being less accessible to ethnic groups, complexities involved in navigating bureaucracy and administration, for example, access to insurance and pharmaceutical benefits, and failure to address language and health literacy barriers.18 In addition, more attention needs to be focused not only on the experiences and needs of patients, but of their family members, especially the partner, who often influences and provides much informal care, especially in acute presentation and during early convalescence.19 Factors at the environmental level predominantly encompass those relating to socioeconomic status. Environmental factors consist of educational attainment, subjective perceptions of social status and social class, linguistic isolation, geographical location and fiscal variables such as insurance status.20 Socioeconomic differences in health outcomes have been widely documented for most health conditions and ethnic groups. People who are poorer and less educated are more likely to suffer from diseases, to experience loss of functioning, to be cognitively and physically impaired and to experience a higher mortality rate.21 Consequently, environmental factors are often assumed to be the root cause of differences in health outcomes for ethnic groups. Also adding to the ethnicity treatment gap is a significant lack of epidemiological data on ‘at-risk’ ethnic groups. For example, a review of large-scale epidemiological data on CVDs and diabetes in migrant and ethnic minority groups in Europe concluded that high-quality, comparable, routine data on CVD health status of ethnic minority populations were not available.22 Other reasons adding to the paucity of epidemiological ethnic data include: lack of consensus on ethnicity indicators identifying ethic groups in available data sources; language and communication difficulties; limited access to interpreters; lack of cultural awareness; and unjustified exclusion of ethnic minority groups.22,23 In addition, primarily due to a lack of intervention, rates of evidence-based change in minority groups are rarely reported. It is well-evidenced that a person’s ethnicity places them at higher likelihood of experiencing CVD and reduced chance of survival compared with their White counterparts. What is less clear is the evidence-base in support of reducing the treatment gap between ethnic and non-ethnic groups. To eliminate ethnic disparities in CVD, systematic and routine collation of epidemiological data, inclusive of all ethnic groups, is essential for the generation of aetiological hypotheses to support public health policy and planning. Only then can we work toward developing a more actionable research agenda that promotes real-world solutions to reduce disparity and improve population-level cardiovascular care. This special edition of the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, ‘How does patient ethnicity influence care?’, is aimed at identifying areas where ethnic disparities are most urgent to enable us, as researchers and clinicians, to better: Detect cardiovascular disease in ethnic groups; Identify the risk factors in ethnic groups; Enable focused delivery of culturally sensitive healthcare programmes to ethnic groups. A holistic approach encompassing ‘patient’, ‘health-care system’ and ‘environmental’ components is crucial to reducing ethnic disparity. Systematic and routine collation of epidemiological data is essential to support public health policy and planning. An actionable research agenda aimed at population-level cardiovascular care is necessary to provide real-world solutions to reduce ethnic disparities. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,071

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,075
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,003
Bibliométrie0,0050,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,005
Communication savante0,0100,008
Science ouverte0,0040,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0330,040
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular NursingMême sujetAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchTravaux en français237 207