MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2795996575 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000532460.25314.82

3 Questions on...Mental Health Outcomes for Survivors of Childhood Cancers

2018· article· en· W2795996575 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah DiGiulio

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMental healthPopulationChildhood cancerCancerFamily medicineCohortHealth careGerontologyPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paul C. Nathan, MD, MSc, FRCPC: Paul C. Nathan, MD, MSc, FRCPCSurvivors of childhood cancer are known to be at higher risk for physical health problems later on, but whether or not (or how much) an early cancer diagnosis affects their mental health risks later on is not so clear. That's according to Paul C. Nathan, MD, MSc, FRCPC, a clinician investigator, staff oncologist, and Director of the Aftercare Program in the Division of Haematology/Oncology at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, who recently investigated the question with his colleagues (Cancer 2018: doi:10.1002/cncr.31279). “A lot of the risk factors were the same things we see in the general population,” Nathan told Oncology Times. “The problem is that we tended to see these problems more frequently in childhood cancer survivors.” The researchers looked at the medical records of 4,117 5-year survivors of childhood cancer treated in any of the five pediatric cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, between 1987 and 2008. Everyone was diagnosed and treated before they were 18. The study cohort also included a control group of 20,269 healthy individuals matched for age, gender, and where they grew up geographically. (Because Canada has a publicly funded health care system, information about medical diagnoses, cancer treatments, and health care visits are available from cancer registries and administrative databases.) The data showed that the childhood cancer survivors had a 34 percent increased risk for a medical visit for a mental health complaint than the general population. More than 40 percent of the survivors in the group studied had at least one visit for a mental health complaint. And the cancer survivors had a 13 percent increased risk for a severe mental health event, which included emergency room visits or hospitalizations due to a mental health complaint or problem. And childhood cancer survivors who were treated at the youngest ages (between 0 and 4 years) were at the highest risk for these severe mental health events. Nathan said he and his colleagues were not surprised by the findings, as some previous evidence and their own clinical experience suggested they would find these elevated rates of mental health problems in survivors of childhood cancer. But, he added that the findings point to some very important implications. Here's what else he told Oncology Times. 1 There's a lot of research when it comes to survivors of childhood cancer—what's new about the question you asked and what you found? “I think much of the focus in some of the survivor outcomes has been on the long-term physical consequences of cancer therapy. We know survivors have an elevated risk for chronic health conditions, such as cardiac disease, new cancers, and endocrine problems. There has been some work in mental health and psychological outcomes, but there's definitely been far less of a focus on that than there has been on the physical manifestations and the physical consequences of therapy. “This study adds to the small, but growing, body of literature that [shows] surviving childhood cancer can impact long-term emotional and psychological health. And [it suggests] that risk-based care for cancer survivors—which considers previous cancer diagnoses, treatments received, and physical consequences—has to focus on mental health consequences as well.” 2 Your data found one of the groups at the highest risk for mental health problems later on were survivors of childhood cancers who were treated at the youngest ages. Do you any suspicions why that group was at the highest risk? “That finding was novel in that survivors who were treated for their cancer at a really young age (4 years or younger) seemed to be at a particularly higher risk for developing a severe mental health problem later on (requiring either hospitalization or an emergency room visit). And we don't really know why. Is there something about having had the traumatic experience of cancer at a very young age that somehow predisposes you to problems later? Is it possible that parents change how they parent their kids who have had cancer? “They may not remember the actual experience of having had cancer. But maybe there's something about the trauma of having cancer—even if you can't remember the details—that has an impact. “Maybe it's that we haven't historically thought about mental health care in these very young patients, so no attention is paid. “These are all potential explanations. But, we would need to do more research in these younger patients to understand why we saw this. But it was a pretty striking finding about how much this risk was elevated.” 3 What are the most important implications of this research? “Message one: The complete care of survivors of childhood cancer must expand beyond just thinking about physical consequences, such as new cancer and heart disease. There needs to be a focus on the mental health of these survivors. And that means that those practitioners looking after them as adults, very often family doctors, need to be aware that they should be screening for things like anxiety, depression, PTSD, substance abuse, [and other problems]. Realizing now that this is a population at risk, there needs to be some focus on that risk. “Two: [We need to look at] whether mental health care resources need to be available or offered more broadly during the pediatric years. Perhaps a more proactive pediatric approach will save patients from running into these mental health issues in adulthood. “And lastly, another important message is [also] that, though the [mental health] risks are higher for survivors of childhood cancer, many of these survivors are also doing absolutely fine. We can be reassuring [to parents and others] that most kids and adults do absolutely fine, but we do need to be on the lookout for those who are struggling and have a means to get them help sooner rather than later.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,268
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,717

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,383
Écart entre enseignants0,353 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeTravaux en français237 207