Why Can't We Be Friends? Informal Relations, Public Policy, and Federalism in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada is an "under-institutionalized" federation (Cameron and Simeon, 2002b).In the extensive world of intergovernmental relations (IGR) which exist between the federal, provincial and territorial governments, formal relations are said to be "the tip of the iceberg" (Kernaghan, 1985: 156).This leaves a good deal of governmental activity in Canada within the realm of 'informal relations,' a world of intergovernmental relations between public servants without formal rules to guide the process.Broadly considered, those relations are important (Inwood et al., 2011).However, scholarship is not neutral on this point: informal relations are frequently treated as being unstructured and inefficient (Meekison et al., 2004).This dissertation tackles the issue of informal relations by asking, at the level of public servants, what are the effects of informal relations on intergovernmental relations?If they are 'important,' what is the nature of this importance?Using a model derived from primary research, the study explores how context shapes informal relations in three case studies of intergovernmental relations: the Agreement on Internal Trade, the Health Care Innovation Working Group, and the Ministerial Conference on the Canadian Francophonie.By focusing on variables at various levels, one can better understand how informality operates in a given context.The study makes two central arguments: first, that informality should not be equated with disorder.By examining the environment in which informal relations occur, one can better understand the effects of those relations.Second, while informal relations are important, this importance must also be understood in context: informal relations have effects on the speed and efficiency of work among public servants, but the environment in which they occur plays an important role in limiting the effects of informality.Thus, the effects of informal relations are shaped by context.Informal relations are present and 'important,' but although they are 'informal,' they are still structured by the environment of Canadian federalism.This project would not have gone far without the willingness of public servants throughout Canada to take time out of their busy schedule to talk to me.Nearly 50 individuals did, and were genuinely interested in the study and in sharing their experiences.Confidentiality (and space) prevent me from thanking them all individually, but if I can use one public servant as a proxy, I am particularly indebted to Chantal Alarie with the Ministerial Conference on the Canadian Francophonie.Chantal championed my research, allowed me to have access to teleconferences and prodded her colleagues to make time in their schedules (as well as agreeing to be thanked by name).Merci Chantal.My principal advisors, Dr. Jonathan Malloy and Dr. Raffaele Iacovino, were consistently available, encouraging, and accepting of my particular path through the PhD.When I told them in 2014 that I intended to write the bulk of my dissertation from my home town of Winnipeg, they expressed no concern (at least not openly!)even though it must have seemed like I was asking for enough rope to hang myself with.Having thus far avoided the noose, I thank them profoundly for their faith and understanding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,035 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».