How neonatologists implement vaccination in premature newborns
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction According to AAP (1992–1998), CDC (2009), and Polish (2015) recommendations, children before 37 weeks of pregnancy should be included in the same vaccination schedule as full-term newborns. It means that these infants should receive vaccinations according to the chronological age. This applies to newborns and infants born with small (< 2500 g), very small (< 1500 g), and extremely low body weight (< 1000 g), as well as children with a maturity of ≤ 33 gestational weeks. Although many studies indicate an immature immune system of this group of children, even those born with maturity below 29 weeks of gestation and those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia induce sufficient immune response to vaccinations. Neither body mass nor maturity are factors in limiting the schedule of recommended vaccination. The aim of the study was to evaluate the implementation of vaccinations in the tertiary and secondary neonatal departments in the Mazovia region in the years 2015-2016 in newborns born before ≤ 33 weeks of pregnancy. Material and methods Vaccination against pneumococci (PCV), pertussis, tetanus, diphtheria, Haemofilus influenza, and poliomyelitis have been evaluated. The children were vaccinated with the most commonly used pentavalent or hexavalent (DTPa-IPV-HIB, DTPa-HBV-IPV-HIB) vaccine and against pneumococci containing 10 or 13 serotypes (11, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14F, 19F, 23F); (1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F). The analysis does not include obligatory vaccination against tuberculosis and hepatitis B. The material was analysed in two groups of gestational age: 23 0/7 – 28 6/7 – I group and in 29 0/7 – 33 6/7 weeks. Results Of the 2149 neonates with gestational age ≤ 33 weeks only 388 (15.7%) were vaccinated against pneumococci before discharge home from the neonatal department. In newborns of maturity 23 0/7 – 28 6/7 gestational age these vaccinations were performed in 217 children, i.e. 51.05% of children with this maturity, which constitutes 55.92% of all vaccinated children against pneumococci. In the second group of 1724 children with the age of 29-33 weeks, the pneumococcal vaccination was given to 171 newborns, i.e. 44.08% of all pneumococcal vaccines, and 9.92% of children with this maturity born between 2015 and 2016. Vaccination with DTPa-HBV-IPV- HIB, or DTPa-IPV-HIB was performed in 340 (15.8%) newborns: 166 newborns in 2015 and 174 newborns in 2016. Conclusions Despite international and Polish recommendations, the implementation of DTPa, IPVHib HBV, and PCV vaccination during hospitalisation of children in neonatal units does not cover all newborns ≤ 33 weeks of gestational age. Only slightly more than half of newborns in 23 0/7 – 28 6/7 gestational age whose hospitalisation in neonatal departments is on average 72 days, receive DTPa, IPVHib HBV, and PCV vaccination before discharge. In the Mazovia region there is a need to extend the procedure of vaccinations in neonatal departments for the safety and comfort of the child as well as the early identification of adverse events, which would allow proper intervention during hospitalisation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,022 | 0,120 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,016 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».