MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2796614559 · doi:10.1353/crc.2018.0003

Anna Lācis and Bernhard Reich: Life and Love in the Theatre

2018· article· en· W2796614559 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Līga Ulberte

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical theatreTheatre directorDramaGermanNazi GermanyPoliticsArt historyArtRealismProletariatLiteratureHistoryLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anna Lācis and Bernhard Reich:Life and Love in the Theatre Līga Ulberte Click for larger view View full resolution Lācis and Reich in the documentary Skatiens. Par Annu Lācis un Bernhardu Reihu (1969, dir. Leonija Mundeciemas). Photo: Susan Ingram (from the screening on March 6, 2015). A theatre director, actress, theorist, and organizer, Anna (Asja) Lācis (1891-1979) is often considered the first to have implemented true epic theatre in Latvian drama due to her working relationship with Bertolt Brecht. The evidence for that claim is difficult to find because she never staged any of Brecht's plays, and her directorial work [End Page 51] in Valmiera Theatre during the years 1948-57 was more influenced by the proletarian and political theatre advocated by the father of European political theatre, Erwin Piscator (1893-1966), and by socialist realism, a mandatory element of Soviet art. In evaluating Lācis's historical significance, a distinction should therefore be made between her professional directing and theoretical work and her contradictory personality, because it is possible that the latter has left a more significant impression. Austrian Jewish director and theatre theorist Bernhard Reich (1894-1972), on the other hand, is one of the most important personalities of the German theatre of the 1920s. As a director and dramaturgical collaborator, he worked with outstanding German directors such as Max Reinhardt and, especially, Bertolt Brecht. In 1922, Reich met Anna Lācis in Berlin, and together they moved to the Soviet Union in 1926 and spent the rest of their lives together in the Soviet sphere. Having survived the repressions of the Stalinist regime, Reich spent the last twenty years of his life in Latvia, where his creative work consisted of both theatre directing and writing theoretical essays. This article demonstrates how theatrical work structured Lācis's and Reich's biographies and makes a case for how interconnected the two theatre-makers were through their shared belief in the importance and influence of theatre. It therefore works against the tendency in scholarship to concentrate on Lācis's personal liaisons by showing the role her work in theatre played in mediating the most important and long-lasting relationship in her life. Anna Lācis's Theatrical Activity Anna Lācis (born Liepina), was born on October 19, 1891, in Kempju parish in Riga district and received her first education at Anna Kenina's Gymnasium in Riga. In 1912, she moved to St. Petersburg, where she enrolled in a two-year program in the Faculty of General Education at Vladimir Bekhterev's Psychoneurological Institute to study psychology. In Petersburg, she saw, for the first time, productions by Vsevolod Meyerhold (Всéволод Мейерхóльд, 1874-1940) and performances by Vladimir Mayakovsky (Владимир Маякóвский, 1893-1930), and fell permanently in love with the theatre. Between 1916 and 1918, she studied at Fyodor Komisarjevsky's (Фёдор Комиссаржéвский, 1882-1954) Theatre Studio in Moscow, where she saw the productions of the second most significant modernist theatre director at the time, Alexander Tairov (Александр Таиров, 1885-1950). Lācis's aesthetic perceptions were significantly influenced by her studies and by the theatre in Moscow and Petersburg: Fyodor Komisarjevsky was fascinated by the medieval theatre. Me too. I liked the versatility of miseen-scenes of mysteries and miracles where the action took place in several places simultaneously. The principle of this simultaneous play I later used in my own productions. My teacher was convinced that art should reveal the most delicate nuances of the soul, and only then could it give to the public aesthetic pleasure. I was more interested [End Page 52] in the jovial, coarse element of commedia dell'arte… (Miglāne et al. 23) Medieval theatre aesthetics impacted Lācis's staging work in the 1920s, and she used the principles of commedia dell'arte in her 1949 production of Carlo Goldoni's comedy The Servant of Two Masters at the Valmiera Theatre. After completing Komisarjevsky's Theatre Studio, Lācis spent two years living in Orel, where she created and managed a study of children's aesthetic education. She also worked with children from a local orphanage and with homeless street children, mostly using the improvisational études method. The...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,940
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian review of comparative literatureMême sujetHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsTravaux en français237 207