MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2797074643 · doi:10.1353/crc.2018.0004

Dear Grandmother, How Are You?: The Influence of Anna Lācis on the Development of Political Theatre in Latvia

2018· article· en· W2797074643 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Krista Burāne

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLatvianContext (archaeology)Destiny (ISS module)PoliticsHistoryPower (physics)ArtArt historyLiteraturePolitical scienceLawPhilosophyArchaeologyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Grandmother, How Are You?The Influence of Anna Lācis on the Development of Political Theatre in Latvia* Krista Burāne Click for larger view View full resolution From the right: Anna Lācis, Māra Ķimele, and Bernhard Reich in Murjāņi, 1960s, LSSR. Photo from the personal archive of Māra Ķimele. Since the 1970s, Māra Ķimele, granddaughter of Anna Lācis, has been one of the most powerful and influential Latvian theatre directors. Many of Māra Ķimele's productions have become pivotal points in the development of Latvian theatre. Her complex personality and exquisitely interesting family, closely connected to the political and cultural history of Latvia throughout the twentieth century, were reasons why I decided to make the feature-length documentary Māra in 2013. Of course, the project was not possible without the presence of Anna Lācis, and not only because [End Page 69] granddaughter and grandmother are united in their choice of career. I was interested in the destiny of two great female artists in the context of power and politics. The collection of the Latvian Literature and Music Museum holds the large, and still unused, epistolary archive of Anna Lācis. A small fraction of it consists of 51 letters that Māra Ķimele wrote to her grandmother between 1953 and 1978. They cover Māra's childhood impressions, college years, and work in the theatre. Only Māra's letters can be found in the archive, and they found their way there after her grandmother's death in 1979. Anna Lācis's replies to these letters have not been preserved. It is curious that Māra Ķimele herself had forgotten about the existence of these letters; using them in the film came as a surprise to her. Even though each of the letters starts with "Dear Grandmother!" and the style and topics of the letters seemingly point to the close connection between granddaughter and grandmother, the author of the letters denies such a closeness. The explanation is to be found in the memoirs of Anna Lācis's daughter, Dagmāra Ķimele: Asja. Režisores Annas Lācis dēkainā dzīve (Asja: The Stormy Life of Director Anna Lācis) (Ķimele and Strautmane). From her daughter's perspective, politics, revolution, and theatre were always more important to Anna Lācis than her family, her daughter and granddaughter. The fate of one photograph serves as an archetypal visual statement of this attitude and of Anna Lācis's willingness to take history-making into her own hands. It is a studio photograph in which Anna Lācis appears with her daughter Dagmāra when the latter was about five years old. Later on, in the 1960s or 1970s, she ordered a graceless photomontage to replace the daughter with Bertolt Brecht in this picture. Although Anna Lācis had really worked alongside Brecht, had been his assistant and, according to her own statements, had played a name-part in Brecht's premiere of The Life of Edward II of England in Munich, and had maintained a close relationship with him until his demise, there are no photographs of just the two of them. However, there are many photographs in which Bertolt Brecht is alongside her and Bernhard Reich in other ways, in the names of posters and books. Anyone who has worked with the photographs in Lācis's archival materials knows how much she liked being photographed with Brecht. The anecdote of the fake photograph is yet another testimonial on behalf of her loyalty to the ideas of political theatre, which manifested in Brecht's work. In this article, I will quote several letters of Māra Ķimele to Anna Lācis that I included in the film and attempt to reveal the signs of the era embedded in them, proof of Anna Lācis's and Māra Ķimele's professional quests, and to relate them to the tradition of political theatre in contemporary Latvia. It can be said without a doubt that Asja was one of the brightest and most expressive pioneers of political theatre in Latvia in the 1920s, and contemporary Latvian artists can metaphorically...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,948
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,897

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian review of comparative literatureMême sujetHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsTravaux en français237 207