Pharmacological and toxicological aspects of performance-enhancing substances
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Organized sport has a history dating back to ancient Greece, but in the early 20th century, pharmaceutical companies expanded the production of remedies offered to treat any health problem. Athletes were free to access whatever substance was available, since there was very little control in sport. During the 50’s, use of anabolic steroids has started. In a paper published in 1973, Silvester proposed a survey of track and field athletes and showed than 68% had utilized anabolic steroids during the 1972 Olympic Games. In the 80’s, Ben Johnson was tested positive for stanozolol during the summer Olympics in Seoul, and this event showed that doping occurred at the highest level in sport. Historians may come to view 1998 as a very special year in the story of drugs in sport. The scandal began in January when a Chinese swimmer was stopped at a routine custom check in Australia with hGH vials in her luggage. During the Tour de France, the Festina affair occurred with a car from the cycling team found full of doping products. In September, the gold champion Florence Griffith Joyner died in her sleep. She was 38…The media reporting of this event asked the question of the responsibility of doping in the death of the athlete. In 1999, the WADA (World antidoping agency) was initiated by the International Olympic Committee based in Canada to promote, coordinate and monitor the fight against drugs in sports. The agency's key activities include scientific research, education, development of anti-doping capacities. Since this period, the WADA has been working closely with international enforcement agencies to uncover doping activities. Among the keys to an effective anti doping program, is the legal definition of doping, but also the publication of the Prohibited List of substances and methods. Of course, the Prohibited List must be an evolving document. According to WADA, the prohibited drugs can be divided into 3 major classes: drugs that are prohibited in and out of competition, drugs prohibited in competition only, and drugs prohibited only in particular sports. These 3 classes are divided into 11 categories, from S0 to S5 for drugs prohibited in and out of competition, S6 to S9 for drugs prohibited in competition and P1 and P2 for drugs prohibited only in particular sports. All performance enhancing drugs are chemicals that promote in any way the athletic performances in humans. Major effects are the following: benefit for muscles, metabolic effects, anabolic effects, bronchodilatation, psychoanaleptic and behavioural effects, hemodilution and increased urinary excretion. But near to these performance enhancing effects, these chemicals also have side effects affecting the brain or the body. Each category of drugs is presented and discussed. Each category is also illustrated by some famous examples.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».