0688 Patients’ Self-reported Precipitating Factors For Sleepwalking
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sleepwalking is a common arousal parasomnia affecting between 2%-4% of the general adult population. Although factors that intensify or disrupt sleep have been shown to increase the likelihood and intensity of somnambulism in predisposed individuals, little is known about the factors sleepwalkers themselves view as most likely to precipitate their episodes. Participants were 165 patients (63 men, 102 women; mean age 32.8 years) referred to our sleep disorders clinic for sleepwalking. Each patient underwent overnight polysomnography to rule out the presence of other major sleep disorders and received a final diagnosis of sleepwalking. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing various aspects of their sleepwalking, including history, nature and frequency of episodes, as well as potential precipitating factors. Precipitating factors were assessed by requiring participants to rate a number of items on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) for the degree to which it contributed to their experiencing episodes. The factors rated by the greatest proportion of sleepwalkers as “often” (4) or “always” precipitating their episodes were stress (70.9% of all patients), bad dreams and nightmares (47.3%), dreams in general (34.5%), sleep deprivation (32,5%), emotionally charged TV shows or movies (26,5%), sleeping in a new environment (25.5%) and irregular sleep schedules (22.4%). Other self-reported factors included sudden noises (14.6%), bed partner moving suddenly (12.7%) and being touched (8.5%). Substance-related factors (e.g., consumption of caffeine, alcohol) were endorsed by fewer than 10% of sleepwalkers. Consistent with the literature, sleepwalkers report stress and sleep deprivation as significant precipitating factors for their episodes. These factors are known to increase sleep pressure or fragment sleep, two conditions associated with increased sleepwalking in predisposed individuals. The fact that dream-related factors were so frequently endorsed underscores the importance of assessing phenomenological aspects associated with sleepwalking. Our findings for substance-related factors contrasts with anecdotal reports suggesting that alcohol consumption is an important precipitating factor of somnambulism. Research supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number MOP 97865).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».