MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2800105679 · doi:10.1353/tech.2018.0002

Lost Sound: The Forgotten Art of Radio Storytelling by Jeff Porter

2018· article· en· W2800105679 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipStorytellingNarrativeRadio programHistoryChapelLiteraturePremiseMedia studiesArt historyArtSociologyVisual artsLawPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Lost Sound: The Forgotten Art of Radio Storytelling by Jeff Porter Noah Arceneaux (bio) Lost Sound: The Forgotten Art of Radio Storytelling. By Jeff Porter. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2016. Pp. 296. $29.95. The premise for this book by Jeff Porter, a professor of English at the University of Iowa, is that the content of radio has not been adequately explored by scholars. While some might argue otherwise, citing Neil Verma’s Theater of the Mind as one example of prior scholarship, it is true that radio has not generated the same level of scholarly attention as literature, cinema, and television. This discrepancy, coupled with the medium’s hundred-year history, suggests that there must be some aspects of its programming that remain fertile ground. Porter addresses this void by focusing on particular types of radio programs, particularly those have taken full advantage of the acoustical possibilities of aural storytelling. The book follows a traditional chronological narrative, with eight chapters that range from the beginnings of broadcasting in the 1920s to innovative radio dramas of the 1930s and ’40s, WWII coverage of Edward Murrow, and postwar avant-garde productions from Dylan Thomas, Samuel Beckett, and Glenn Gould. A final chapter on National Public Radio (NPR), which also covers the ongoing podcasting phenomenon, brings the story into the twenty-first century. This is not document-driven scholarship, looking at new or previously unexplored archival material, but rather a deep analysis of audio production techniques. Reading several pages of a scholarly dissection of The Fall of the City, a landmark 1937 radio drama, or Sorry, Wrong Number, the famed thriller first broadcast in 1943, may be frustrating for some readers. The emotions evoked by specific sounds do not lend themselves easily to written explication, which is indeed one of the issues that makes the academic study of audio inherently challenging. Serious [End Page 199] readers will no doubt find themselves searching online for recordings of the programs under analysis. Other readers may be frustrated by the intense level of analysis, which can approach the level of heavily theoretical discourse often associated with film studies. The second chapter, focusing on the Columbia Workshop, is one of the stronger sections. The CBS radio network, in second place to the larger NBC, developed an innovative solution to fill some of its non-sponsored airtime. The Columbia Workshop was introduced in 1936, featuring dramas that borrowed techniques from modernist literature, such as multiple points of view and unreliable narrators. These “prestige” dramas, as the Columbia Workshop and its imitators were known, deliberately embraced what Porter dubs “acoustic deviance.” This term emphasizes that sounds are open to interpretation, and producers created vivid mental landscapes in listeners’ minds. This attempt to encourage subjectivity is contrasted with the so-called “mastering effect,” in which radio shows simplified their storytelling, leaving little room for interpretation. As a counter-example to the prestige dramas, Porter describes the assembly line production of the soap operas of Frank and Anne Hummert. Their scripts included explicit emotional directions for the actors, and sound effects not delineated in the script were forbidden. Another strong chapter is one on Glenn Gould, the renowned pianist who abandoned traditional instruments and turned to avant-garde radio drama. For Canadian radio, Gould produced the Solitude Trilogy, three hour-long radio documentaries that wove voices together in overlapping, sometimes disjointed montages. For Gould, the human voice itself could be an instrument, with meaning that was not always literal. All of the chapters include fascinating glimpses into radio’s past. In 1934, for example, an episode of Calling All Cars dramatized a police standoff with escaped convicts, a mere three hours after the actual events had transpired. A discussion of the privileged position given to the male voice is highlighted in the discussion of Betty Watson, a CBS war correspondent who was banned from the airwaves because her voice was considered inappropriate for serious news. The section on NPR also includes mention of Ken Nordine’s Word Jazz series, one of the more playful and intriguing uses of radio and verbal gymnastics. Readers with a particular interest in radio or sound studies will find this...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,278
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,702

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle