Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We live with new necessities of research and consequently with new political forms and arrangements of research, demanding a new look on and for them. This is a study of FAPEMIG and the promotion of scientific research. Having as thesis, if FAPEMIG predominantly serves the reproductive interests of capital, has as main objective, understand and analyze the directions of FAPEMIG proposals in the last decade, thus, identifying if the agency complies with neoliberal international scientific guidelines, promoting higher investments in knowledge areas that respond to the productive interests of capital. More specifically, present FAPEMIG and its budget distribution for the different sets of promotion modalities; understand how it has been building the system of promotion for Universal Demand and Induced Demand projects launched by the agency between the years of 2007 to 2016 and if these, articulating through demands of the capitalist way of growth and economic-social development, imply in higher or lower investments for certain knowledge areas (humanities areas, for example) and even for certain research institutions in Minas Gerais; and finally, understand the world of work transformations by configuring the process and organization of academic and technological research in Brazil, in the neoliberalism context. Taking as a reference the dialectic analytics perspectives manifested in the principle of totality which the particular is explained in general and vice versa, an investigation was carried out having as reference the FAPEMIG action from the possible influences received in an international scope. In this sense, a bibliographical survey and documentary analysis was carried out expressed in the research notices, Activity Reports and Deliberations of the Curator Council. However, FAPEMIG has a strong and competent system of research promotion, focused on human resources formation, basic research and applied research, and seeks to use standards and criteria to research promotion, as close as possible to those internationally consolidated, coupled and defined by some policy requirements under capital domain. In this perspective, the investments presented by FAPEMIG are indispensable to the induction and promotion of research and scientific and technological innovation in the State of Minas Gerais. That way, FAPEMIG, as the largest research promotion agency in Minas Gerais and the second largest in Brazil, has established, through a solid ST&I system, the research, programs and projects development is associated with great social and economic problems of the State, taking into account the reproductive interests of capital. This sense of giving utility to research has reoriented researches and universities to adapt their research practices to neoliberal objectives.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».