Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book is a small, but weighty, tome; in fact, it weighs two-and-a-half pounds. It is, as the editors describe, a resource guide for all aspects of endourology and especially advanced endourology. It is a multi-authored book written by national and world experts in endourology from the US and Canada. This book, therefore, provides very much an American view of endourology. Each chapter, however, is very well referenced and covers world-wide opinion, which gives an international flavour to the text. The book itself is divided into six parts: diagnosis and instrumentation, calculus therapy, incisional therapy, ablative therapy, complications of endourology and paediatric minimally invasive surgery. Each chapter is written to the same pattern, starting with the contents, followed by a summary and introduction to the chapter; the text follows with a final conclusion and a comprehensive list of references. Each topic is covered by a structured programme of indications, instrumentation, technique, results, complications, tips and tricks and a final conclusion. This makes the chapters very readable, while the structure makes dipping into it and picking out various techniques and outcomes very easy, which I found particularly useful. The style of the text is very formal and slightly old-fashioned. Occasionally, the text is a little too long and could be better paragraphed to make it more readable. The illustrations are also slightly old-fashioned, with some of the X-rays and endoscopic views not of the best quality. There are not enough line diagrams or drawings to illustrate the text and because of this, like many textbooks of this sort they tend to date relatively easily. The book, however, has included with it a DVD that contains 16 separate videos each well produced, demonstrating common, essential and advanced techniques all of which complement the text very well. Learning surgery from a written description is almost impossible without the global picture that live surgery or videos bring. This greatly enhances the whole experience of the book and makes it well worth reading. The authors say that every urologist should have this book. I am not sure that I would go that far but agree that all departments should have this book. It is helpful and practical both for the everyday urologist and the endourological surgeon. It is also essential reading for residents who are working for their board or final fellowship exams.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle