Long-term maintenance of platelet responses in adult patients with persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia treated with Fostamatinib: 1-year efficacy and safety results
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia(ITP) is characterized by platelet (plt) phagocytosis, predominantly autoantibody-directed, mediated by activated monocyte Fc receptors which signal via spleen tyrosine kinase (syk). This, and T cell-mediated mechanisms, lead to suboptimal plt production. The safety and efficacy of investigational fostamatinib, an oral syk inhibitor, was evaluated in adult persistent/chronic ITP in two parallel, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled (2 active:1 placebo), double-blind phase 3 studies, each 24 weeks in duration; one performed in North America, Australia and Europe (047) and one in Europe (048). The median duration of ITP at study entry was 8.5 years and patients (pts) were heavily pretreated with ITP therapies: 94% of pts had received corticosteroids, 47% thrombopoietin-receptor agonists, 32% rituximab and 35% splenectomy. Pts from either study were eligible to enroll in an ongoing open-label extension study (049). Pts initially received fostamatinib 100 mg BID, which could be increased to 150 mg BID if the pt did not have a plt response. A stable response (SR) was achieved in 18/101 (18%) fostamatinib vs 1/49 (2%) placebo pts in 047/048 (p=0.007). We report safety and durability of response among pts who achieved an SR to fostamatinib across studies 047, 048, and 049 including pts on placebo in the 047/048 studies who received active drug in 049. Methods: SR was defined as a plt count ≥50/nL at 4 of 6 evaluations every 2 weeks during weeks 14-24 (in 047/048) or as a plt count ≥50/nL within 12 weeks of starting treatment without the need for rescue therapy and ≥50/nL at 2 of the 3 subsequent monthly evaluations (in 049). Loss of response was prospectively defined as 2 plt counts at least 4 weeks apart Results: 123 of 150 pts (82%) who participated in 047/048, enrolled in 049. Pts first received fostamatinib in 047 (n=36), 048 (n=43) or 049 (n=44); a total of 27 (22%) pts achieved an SR. Among pts who received placebo during the 047/048 studies and then received fostamatinib in 049, 10 of 44 (23%) pts achieved an SR compared to only one (2%) pt when these same pts were treated with placebo (p=0.0039). As of April 14, 2017, ≥12 months had elapsed since fostamatinib therapy initiation in 117 of 123 pts, including 25 of 27 pts achieving SRs as well as those who did not respond or who have discontinued therapy. Seventeen of 25 (68%) pts maintained their response, with a median plt count of 23/nL at the last evaluation before starting fostamatinib treatment and a median plt count of 111/nL and 115/nL after 12 and 52 weeks of fostamatinib treatment, respectively. Among the 8 pts who achieved an SR but did not maintain it, 4 continued on study and elected to remain on drug and 4 discontinued early (2 adverse events [AEs], 1 lack of efficacy, and 1 pt decision). The Kaplan-Meier median duration of response (months; [min, max]) for the 17 pts who maintained an SR has not yet been reached, and is estimated as >28 months (12, >28). Ninety-two of 123 (75%) pts experienced ≥1 AE with the majority (72%) being mild or moderate in severity; 64 (52%) pts experienced ≥1 treatment-related AE. The most common AEs were: diarrhea (28%), hypertension (15%), petechiae (15%), and epistaxis (14%). Serious AEs were reported in 27 of 123 pts (22%); bleeding-related SAEs were experienced by 11 pts, 10 of whom were nonresponders. AEs leading to study drug withdrawal occurred in 15 of 123 pts (12%) including diarrhea (n=5), liver enzyme elevations (n=3), and neutropenia (n=2), which occurred in more than one pt. Conclusions: Most heavily pre-treated adult persistent/chronic ITP pts with long disease duration who achieved an SR to fostamatinib maintenance therapy in studies 047, 048, and 049 were able to maintain an SR for ≥12 months and up to >24 months in some pts. The majority of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and consistent with those observed in previous ITP and rheumatoid arthritis studies with fostamatinib. Disclosures Bussel: Boehringer Ingleheim: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; UpToDate: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; Momenta: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Protalex: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prophylix: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Speakers Bureau. Arnold: UCB: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Cooper: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghanima: Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Zayed: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cadieux: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Duliege: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».