Investigating the Role of the Vascular Endothelium in Insulin Delivery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Insulin is produced in the pancreas and circulates in the blood before crossing the vascular endothelium to gain access to target tissues. The delivery of insulin from the blood to tissues occurs in two stages: first, blood carrying insulin must perfuse the capillary beds. In arteries, insulin stimulates the endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide, which induces vasodilation of the surrounding vascular smooth muscle to increase blood flow. This in turn recruits capillaries that irrigate peripheral tissues. Second, insulin must cross the endothelial monolayer in order to reach the surrounding tissue (e.g. smooth or striated muscle). Classic studies demonstrated that insulin delivery is rate‐limiting to its metabolic action; notably, capillary recruitment and perfusion are compromised in insulin resistant states, thereby decreasing insulin access to the tissues. However, the contribution of insulin transfer across the endothelial layer to insulin action is unclear. In vivo studies cannot define this contribution due to confounding from vessel dilation or capillary recruitment, which contribute to perfusion. On the other hand, in vitro data from cultured endothelial cells suggest that insulin crosses endothelial monolayers by a saturable transport process (e.g. transcytosis). However, it is uncertain whether cells in culture adequately model normal physiology, as cultured endothelial cells are known to rapidly undergo phenotypic drift. Most of the in vitro work on insulin transcytosis has been performed using endothelial cells derived from large vessels such as the aorta. As mentioned, smooth muscle cells respond to insulin stimulation but how insulin crosses the aortic endothelium is unclear. Rationale Because of inherent limitations of both in vivo and in vitro studies, whether the endothelium constitutes a barrier to insulin and restricts its delivery is unknown. Objective To evaluate the contribution of the endothelial barrier to insulin delivery independent of confounding by hemodynamic forces, through an ex vivo perfusion assay. Methods Murine aortas were isolated and segments perfused ex vivo with insulin alone or in the presence of inducers of endothelial barrier dysfunction (histamine or platelet activating factor). Insulin action in vascular smooth muscle was measured by immunoblotting for Akt phosphorylation; blots were normalized to total Akt and to smooth‐muscle actin. The effectiveness of histamine/PAF to induce endothelial leak was established by perfusion with 70kDa dextran. Results The ex vivo aorta responded to insulin in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner; insulin (10nM) perfusion elicited significant increases in Akt phosphorylation after 5 min (1.4 fold) that were maintained at 30 min (1.3 fold). Perfusion with histamine and PAF induced rapid endothelial leak, demonstrated by accumulation of dextran in the vascular intima; however there was no change in the kinetics of insulin action. Aortic perfusion with 100 nM insulin showed similar results. Conclusions Our results suggest that the endothelium is not rate‐limiting to insulin delivery in large vessels, contrary to existing literature. We are currently using similar approaches to study the microvascular endothelium. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP‐130493 to A. Klip and W. Lee. V. Tokarz was supported by a graduate studentship from the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre and a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Studentship in Science and Technology from the University of Toronto.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».