3.8-W1Impacting clinical and cultural competencies through cross-cultural connections: the development of an International Indigenous Academic Health Network
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The health disparities between Indigenous Canadians and the general Canadian population are strikingly similar to those experienced by Indigenous people around the world (1). It is this shared experience that underlies the development of this international network and the collective need to address health inequities and disparities. The University of Manitoba’s Max Rady College of Medicine in the Rady Faculty of Health Sciences is leading a project that seeks to further develop an International Academic Network in Indigenous Health Universities and health care institutions are largely based on colonial European culture and, as such, tend to place patients who are culturally or ethnically different from the mainstream at greater risk of experiencing adverse health events (2). The Network was established to stimulate knowledge creation and mobilisation in the area of Indigenous Health across the domains of medical education, health research and health service delivery. The Network also facilitates academic exchanges that will influence positive changes in approaches to Indigenous Health teaching, research and health service delivery through our Network Faculty Partnerships. The workshop discussion will focus on Indigenous health within the constructs of academic institutions that prepare health care professionals for practice in a diverse community. The workshop format will work well as the presenters will share some background on Indigenous Health, the limitations of current approaches and the benefits of an international academic network in supporting best practice in Indigenous Health. Objectives: To explore and discuss the role of national legislation, policies and services and the implications for action on the health and wellbeing of Indigenous Peoples in Canada. This will be presented within the context of how racial or ethnic health differences may result in inequalities and disparities, including discrimination, social exclusion and marginalisation of racial groups. To explore and to share the approaches to academic and health system responsiveness to diversity, the development of good clinical practice, and the development of professional training and education. Workshop Plan: The two presenters will share current information on the Canadian context and the development of the academic health network. Following the presentations, we will open a dialogue on approaches for cultural safety in the learning and work environment and for advocacy of equity in academic and health systems (3). The goal is to identify best practices that will mitigate the impact of bias in addressing racial or ethnic inequalities and health disparities. We will share the benefits of international collaboration on best practices in Indigenous Health. Main messages: The workshop dialogue will highlight the need for health care professionals and academics to advocate for equity and to advocate for a culturally safe approach to education, training and health service delivery. References 1. Reading, J. A global model and national network for Aboriginal health research excellence. Can J Public Health. 2003;94:185-9. 2. Svendson AC, Laberge M. Convening stakeholder networks: a new way of thinking, being and engaging. J Corp Citizen. 2005;19:91-104. 3. Walker R, Cromarty H, Kelly L, St Pierre-Hansen N. Achieving Cultural Safety in Aboriginal Health Services: implementation of a cross-cultural safety model in a hospital setting. Divers Health Care. 2009;6:11-22.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,034 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».