Hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk: a cautionary note about metabolic confounding
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Triglycerides are the conventional tool to measure VLDLs, whereas LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is the conventional tool to measure LDLs. Multiple epidemiological studies, including a series of genetically based analyses, have demonstrated that cardiovascular risk is related to triglycerides independently of LDL-C, and this has led to a series of new therapeutic agents designed specifically to reduce plasma triglycerides. The triglyceride hypothesis posits that increased levels of triglycerides increase cardiovascular risk and decreasing plasma triglycerides decreases cardiovascular risk. In this work, we will examine the validity of the triglyceride hypothesis by detailing the biological complexities associated with hypertriglyceridemia, the genetic epidemiological evidence in favor of hypertriglyceridemia, the evidence from the fibrate randomized clinical trials relating triglycerides and clinical outcomes, and the completeness of the evidence from the initial studies of novel mutations and the therapeutic agents based on these mutations that lower triglycerides. Because of the multiple metabolic links between VLDL and LDL, we will try to demonstrate that measuring triglycerides and LDL-C alone are inadequate to document the lipoprotein profile. We will try to demonstrate that apoB must be measured, as well as triglycerides and cholesterol, to have an accurate estimate of lipoprotein status. Triglycerides are the conventional tool to measure VLDLs, whereas LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is the conventional tool to measure LDLs. Multiple epidemiological studies, including a series of genetically based analyses, have demonstrated that cardiovascular risk is related to triglycerides independently of LDL-C, and this has led to a series of new therapeutic agents designed specifically to reduce plasma triglycerides. The triglyceride hypothesis posits that increased levels of triglycerides increase cardiovascular risk and decreasing plasma triglycerides decreases cardiovascular risk. In this work, we will examine the validity of the triglyceride hypothesis by detailing the biological complexities associated with hypertriglyceridemia, the genetic epidemiological evidence in favor of hypertriglyceridemia, the evidence from the fibrate randomized clinical trials relating triglycerides and clinical outcomes, and the completeness of the evidence from the initial studies of novel mutations and the therapeutic agents based on these mutations that lower triglycerides. Because of the multiple metabolic links between VLDL and LDL, we will try to demonstrate that measuring triglycerides and LDL-C alone are inadequate to document the lipoprotein profile. We will try to demonstrate that apoB must be measured, as well as triglycerides and cholesterol, to have an accurate estimate of lipoprotein status. Multiple lines of epidemiological evidence, including most recently, Mendelian randomization studies (1.Jørgensen A.B. Frikke-Schmidt R. West A.S. Grande P. Nordestgaard B.G. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Genetically elevated non-fasting triglycerides and calculated remnant cholesterol as causal risk factors for myocardial infarction.Eur. Heart J. 2013; 34: 1826-1833Crossref PubMed Scopus (287) Google Scholar, 2.Varbo A. Benn M. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Jørgensen A.B. Frikke-Schmidt R. Nordestgaard B.G. Remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013; 61: 427-436Crossref PubMed Scopus (629) Google Scholar, 3.Do R. Willer C.J. Schmidt E.M. Sengupta S. Gao C. Peloso G.M. Gustafsson S. Kanoni S. Ganna A. Chen J. et al.Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease.Nat. Genet. 2013; 45: 1345-1352Crossref PubMed Scopus (616) Google Scholar), tie plasma triglycerides to the risk of atherosclerotic CVD. Conventionally, cholesterol and triglycerides have been regarded as markers that represent separate and distinct lipoprotein classes: triglycerides are the principal lipid constituent of VLDL particles and elevated triglycerides, therefore, identify elevated VLDL levels; whereas cholesterol is the principal lipid constituent of LDL particles and elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), therefore, identifies elevated LDL levels. In this paradigm, the lipid component of a lipoprotein particle is accepted as fully informative of the atherogenic risk associated with the lipoprotein particle. Accordingly, based on the epidemiological evidence, novel therapeutic agents with major effects on triglyceride concentrations, but with little effect on LDL-C, are being developed. The operating assumption is that if LDL-C is not affected, clinical risk and benefit must relate to differences in plasma triglycerides, not to differences in LDL. However, hypertriglyceridemia may reflect increased numbers of one or more classes of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles, which have different relations to cardiovascular risk. Most VLDL apoB particles are small enough to enter the arterial wall. By contrast, most chylomicron particles are too large to enter the arterial wall and, therefore, the cholesterol and triglyceride they contain are no threat to the integrity of the arterial wall. Although VLDL particles do, in general, account for most of the mass of triglycerides in plasma, the mass of triglyceride per VLDL particle is not uniform. Accordingly, hypertriglyceridemia due to VLDL may be the consequence of an increased mass of triglyceride per VLDL particle, an increase in the number of VLDL particles, or both. Moreover, VLDL particles are the metabolic precursors of LDL particles and the concentration of LDL particles in plasma depends upon the production rate of VLDL particles and the proportion that are converted to LDL particles, as well as the clearance rate of LDL particles (4.De Graaf J. Couture P. Sniderman A. ApoB in Clinical Care. Springer, Houten, The Netherlands2015Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar). All of these can vary independently and substantially. In addition, the composition of VLDL and LDL particles can change independently of their production rates: cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP)-mediated exchanges and transfers of triglyceride and cholesterol ester between chylomicrons and VLDL particles, on the one hand, and LDL and HDL particles, on the other, produce VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles of variable size with variable masses of cholesterol and triglyceride. Higher plasma triglycerides lead to cholesterol-enriched VLDL particles and cholesterol-diminished LDL and HDL particles (4.De Graaf J. Couture P. Sniderman A. ApoB in Clinical Care. Springer, Houten, The Netherlands2015Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar), whereas lower triglycerides may be associated with cholesterol-enriched apoB particles. This variance in composition means that VLDL particle concentration cannot be reliably deduced from the concentration of triglyceride in plasma and LDL particle concentration cannot be reliably deduced from the concentration of LDL-C in plasma (4.De Graaf J. Couture P. Sniderman A. ApoB in Clinical Care. Springer, Houten, The Netherlands2015Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar). This discordance between lipid composition and particle number is important because there is considerable evidence that the atherogenic risk associated with the apoB lipoproteins more to the number of apoB particles with the mass of cholesterol between lipoprotein particle number and cholesterol an PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Moreover, with the of the proportion of VLDL apoB LDL apoB particles is in with hypertriglyceridemia in LDL particles to account for the of apoB particles A. Graaf J. Couture P. of hypertriglyceridemia by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This means that clinical benefit from genetic mutations and that lower triglycerides be in on their effects on the number of LDL particles, effects that not be from of we that VLDL apoB is as accurate a of the risk due to VLDL particles as plasma triglycerides or VLDL cholesterol the agents that lower cardiovascular and lower plasma Moreover, their clinical benefit more to the in apoB to the in LDL-C or cholesterol R. Couture P. Graaf J. Sniderman A. of change in plasma levels of LDL-C, and apoB with risk from a of randomized Am. Heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. of of of lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein cholesterol for cardiovascular risk in randomized J. Cardiol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in the of the evidence from Mendelian randomization is that clinical benefit to the in not to the increase in or the in LDL-C C.J. C. et of genetic variants related to and with lipoprotein levels and cardiovascular PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This means that in apoB particle number and their to in risk to be can be triglycerides are an risk factor for and agents that lower triglycerides are to and, if they do, Accordingly, this will the metabolic between the and apoB the evidence from the genetic mutations and Mendelian randomization that triglycerides are an risk factor for the evidence from randomized clinical trials that triglycerides clinical and, the of the evidence from the new series of agents as to their effect on the apoB lipoprotein profile. will be that of alone not a of lipoprotein status. apoB is of apoB particles the arterial wall is to the and of the atherosclerotic The of the different apoB lipoproteins to this is by their their and their to to of the the arterial wall J. The of arterial of lipoproteins in the of a of PubMed Scopus Google particles contain one of and are in plasma as or remnant particles between lipoprotein particle number and cholesterol an PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the a chylomicron particle to multiple of on the of and the of triglyceride are in and the of are by the and triglycerides, a metabolic which be if levels of are to be Moreover, as the chylomicron triglycerides are being the of the particle and transfer protein the of from the The of triglyceride and of the chylomicron particles, which are from the of the in and The remnant particle, which is the of the in chylomicron and a of the but the cholesterol, is by the The that the of LDL particles, the LDL have been in This with the for the of the apoB which to be more and chylomicron particles are too large to threat to the arterial wall plasma triglycerides are By contrast, they the of the they can an remnant particles are small enough to enter the arterial wall and contain of However, in there are more VLDL particles particles C. S. C. lipoprotein in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. M. et concentration of in with and coronary artery 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. a in a PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of these particles large of cholesterol and to atherogenic risk. VLDL particles are triglyceride-rich particles that from the to and (4.De Graaf J. Couture P. Sniderman A. ApoB in Clinical Care. Springer, Houten, The Netherlands2015Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar). most of the triglycerides in plasma are in VLDL particles, but the mass of triglyceride per VLDL particle and, therefore, the size of VLDL particles and between are multiple for this variance in composition of VLDL particles by the can with the more particles more triglyceride the particles J. C. Couture P. effect of and on in of and in with with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. M. A. of on and in 45: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. of lipoprotein by and in with the metabolic PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). because the which of these particles is may the rate of triglyceride by the will vary to the rate of of VLDL particles. as VLDL particles by in the and their triglyceride will be and their therefore, will lipid will to increase the cholesterol the triglyceride of VLDL particles. the metabolic of VLDL particles is more chylomicron particles. The VLDL particles that are and of of their triglyceride by may be from the plasma by the or converted to and LDL particles. one the is not and a in of apoB and atherogenic risk. In most a small of VLDL particles are converted to LDL particles. the in which of VLDL to LDL is a major metabolic of VLDL are to because these have large numbers of LDL particles. to this of the agents that will be to this This to their effects on VLDL and LDL particle and remnant lipoprotein particles may be in clearance of VLDL and chylomicron particles by the lipid which in increased numbers of cholesterol-enriched remnant particles the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, an of remnant PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In remnant particles VLDL remnant particles are in or more the concentration of remnant particles C. S. C. lipoprotein in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. M. et concentration of in with and coronary artery 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. Couture P. The of plasma of lipoproteins in is of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This risk of in are and can be based on cholesterol, and apoB A. A. J. C. Couture P. of from plasma cholesterol, and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). apoB particles with a of as particles, whereas with a of as LDL particles. However, this is not and apoB particles with a between and are LDL particles. LDL-C the cholesterol as well as the cholesterol LDL. The evidence to that the mass of cholesterol the LDL particle not change the atherogenic of the particles are as atherogenic as more LDL particles S. M. P. LDL particle LDL particle and in the of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, for cholesterol a concentration of LDL particles more LDL particles to the cholesterol in the in to risk be from the the lipid of LDL particles not to their atherogenic the of to the particle may increase atherogenic J. lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), of may this risk J. in VLDL and LDL with is associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease.J. Am. Heart 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). particles are LDL particles to which a of has been is evidence that the risk of in to the of lipoprotein a that is of LDL-C or apoB S. in and Am. Coll. Cardiol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. new from PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB in with hypertriglyceridemia and is variable is not triglyceride VLDL particles of apoB with hypertriglyceridemia they of apoB but with to hypertriglyceridemia they of apoB A. Graaf J. Couture P. of hypertriglyceridemia by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). with by J. C. Couture P. effect of and on in of and in with with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. M. A. of on and in 45: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. of lipoprotein by and in with the metabolic PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the proportion of apoB particles that are VLDL particles as triglyceride levels the number of LDL particles the number of VLDL particles. as VLDL particle number atherogenic risk. because the triglyceride of VLDL apoB particles is plasma apoB cannot be from plasma triglycerides. This is from which triglycerides apoB in of and Graaf J. Couture P. of LDL PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is no between the a between VLDL apoB and plasma triglycerides. apoB cannot be reliably from plasma triglycerides. This is because multiple studies have that cardiovascular risk in but with elevated in but with apoB M. and lipoprotein levels in and with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. of hypertriglyceridemia on the of plasma and LDL PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. of with hypertriglyceridemia and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. J. and and lipoproteins in with and myocardial Heart J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. of and in coronary artery Heart J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. Clinical of of and in with and coronary artery PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This in the Heart which a epidemiological S. of in ischemic heart from the J. Cardiol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the in LDL particle number and, therefore, apoB cardiovascular risk is in with in with hypertriglyceridemia in the of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). By contrast, as in there is a between plasma triglycerides and This means that the cardiovascular risk associated with these markers be if not to one from the conventional epidemiological have demonstrated a between plasma triglycerides and coronary heart risk. However, for or these relations no This not be the the as to which may be causal and which may Mendelian randomization has been to this Mendelian randomization to genetic variants that plasma levels of factors that may be related to a of the of that The of is that the genetic of for the of is and, therefore, be of genetic and a causal by Mendelian randomization is if the genetic is related to a change in risk is to be due to a change in to that However, if a genetic to multiple in different to one of these differences in be a genetic in multiple in factors the can be to the not to of the M. Mendelian randomization in in Cardiol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This to Mendelian randomization of the of triglycerides to cardiovascular risk. This to myocardial with a of myocardial associated with risk which more in variants in the that associated with elevated LDL-C more in novel the that variants in associated with triglycerides more in associated with and lower However, no on apoB in this is a which with VLDL particles and has multiple effects on triglyceride including an increase in triglyceride and a in triglyceride an effect on apoB The of LDL-C not by the of the The triglyceride per the in and the increase in apoB However, the of the associated with an increase in VLDL particle size as well as VLDL particle and the of triglyceride VLDL particle number on risk not Moreover, the effect of triglyceride on risk for and The that these are with of the which demonstrated that the between triglycerides and cardiovascular risk in a but not in a P. S. A. S. et and risk of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that their not demonstrate that triglycerides per increase cardiovascular but that risk is increased by This multiple for LDL-C, triglycerides, and an which the and a which associated with one but not the The is more and, therefore, more The is more but and the for LDL-C in and analyses, and The for triglyceride in the and but in the The for in the but not the Multiple demonstrate the relations to cardiovascular risk. The that LDL-C causal for cardiovascular triglycerides but to be the triglycerides and cardiovascular risk Moreover, apoB not in the genetic variants in the and of in with the and triglycerides in the Heart and their effect on risk in the the and the Heart The for of triglycerides and to a genetic of The differences in triglycerides for apoB or and for apoB not reduce the risk associated with triglycerides. Accordingly, they that the differences in risk relate to triglycerides and not to or This is not cardiovascular risk is more related to apoB triglycerides, change in risk will be associated with a change in apoB in triglycerides. Moreover, apoB in in the in but lower in in the The are the mass of evidence that apoB is in with with CVD. We will the fibrate randomized clinical trials and the of the effect with the of the clinical The reduce coronary in the of heart from the of Heart J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). but Triglycerides not and in one of this no evidence with to triglyceride. benefit to the in The coronary risk and in coronary heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). cholesterol by triglycerides by risk by which not The well to that by the J. R. M. J. J. R. A. et and of and of from in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The Heart designed to the clinical benefit of and in P. P. P. P. Heart with in with of in risk and of coronary heart J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). by increased by this to the cholesterol by by and triglycerides by The in have been which a as from the of the Chen R. et of in with atherosclerotic J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The a designed to reduce risk by and triglycerides with by HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in with coronary artery PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). on in that the from a to a this with a of a a in the This associated with a in triglycerides and an increase in but a in LDL-C and a in on the the in LDL-C J. R. M. J. J. R. A. et and of and of from in PubMed Scopus Google the in Chen R. et of in with atherosclerotic J. PubMed Scopus Google be to produce a The a designed to with but with a LDL-C et for the of coronary heart in with levels of lipoprotein J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and triglycerides cholesterol with no change in have from to a of have by The clinical that by Chen R. et of in with atherosclerotic J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the benefit the in with triglycerides and whereas in with with The and in a in with that to cardiovascular risk A. P. J. R. P. A. P. et of on cardiovascular in with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). there a to benefit with an in the cholesterol by LDL-C by triglycerides by and increased by apoB by and in not of the and levels of cholesterol, LDL-C, and but not triglycerides. LDL-C and apoB more in in differences the of the apoB from in to the on whereas for there no The benefit in the and the benefit are with the in apoB R. Couture P. Graaf J. Sniderman A. of change in plasma levels of LDL-C, and apoB with risk from a of randomized Am. Heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The to in designed to the of more alone in with P. et of lipid in J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Triglycerides by and increased by whereas LDL-C not between the The not in the with the In the clinical benefit of fibrate ischemic in of the However, in the fibrate trials in which they measured, there a of triglycerides. the triglyceride to whereas the clinical Moreover, with the of the the of benefit with the benefit that be from the in LDL-C or or the triglyceride that triglycerides are cardiovascular risk is elevated and that triglycerides in and by reduce cardiovascular risk and produce clinical the hand, this of the triglyceride hypothesis an the apoB which that the benefit of fibrate is due to of the apoB atherogenic which is in of plasma the effects of and on plasma VLDL and LDL apoB J. C. Couture P. effect of and on in of and in with with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. M. A. of on and in 45: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. of lipoprotein by and in with the metabolic PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et of in with J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). lower VLDL and LDL they lower plasma By contrast, lower VLDL but reduce LDL The effect of and on VLDL apoB is but their effects on LDL apoB are are in in levels of VLDL apoB to be The therefore, is a to of plasma The apoB hypothesis account for benefit from is whereas benefit from fibrate is and because if VLDL apoB for a proportion of apoB will there be a in apoB to clinical series of novel and important therapeutic is to lower triglycerides, are in the of clinical of and protein The of agents is by evidence that genetic variants have been associated with on plasma triglycerides and, in cardiovascular risk. and has been based on the triglyceride We will on the as to their on VLDL LDL and is a which is in the and is associated with chylomicrons and VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles. may the of apoB particles multiple is a of but may and and clearance of triglyceride-rich remnant lipoprotein particles to the for a lipid 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). may VLDL and a new protein factor and of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a between plasma and coronary risk has been demonstrated J. lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, P. VLDL, and and risk of coronary in the and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), as well as between and and risk J. lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). may account for of the risk associated with and J. lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the associated with is the that the atherogenic risk of a VLDL particle or a LDL particle is related to the of the particle J. in VLDL and LDL with is associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease.J. Am. Heart 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The evidence that of levels in plasma may reduce cardiovascular risk is based on the associated effects of mutations that produce and the effects of of of by the and HDL of the of the and which associated with lower levels of triglyceride and lower levels of cardiovascular risk and HDL of the and J. Peloso G.M. mutations in triglycerides, and coronary J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). lower levels of LDL-C The between and plasma triglycerides the by of lipid the between and VLDL particle between and large VLDL particles, small LDL particles, and apoB with to large LDL particles and large HDL particles, to the of on LDL and HDL lipoprotein particles, as well as on VLDL particles. The on the apoB lipoprotein therefore, not This is with the of the by Jørgensen et A.B. Frikke-Schmidt R. Nordestgaard B.G. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. mutations in and risk of ischemic J. PubMed Scopus Google in the of the of which demonstrated that of mutations in associated with lower levels of triglycerides and cardiovascular risk in in Triglycerides in by by that these the in apoB account for of the in cardiovascular risk. these that in risk with the mutations be due to of apoB particle number as well as triglyceride. and not evidence that LDL as well as triglyceride levels from the of et J. et in a plasma lipid and PubMed Scopus Google that a of in associated with lower levels of LDL-C, lower levels of and triglycerides, and a lower of coronary in with apoB not By contrast, with a of in a of lower plasma but LDL-C P. A. et and in a with a rate of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is a of of this to with in major decreases in plasma triglycerides, which associated with decreases in plasma and plasma and in plasma et in the J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the in for major of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles. on not of the effects of in with to but not hypertriglyceridemia, of on fibrate by the et of in with J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). levels in a in and this associated with a in plasma triglycerides, but an increase in LDL-C increased in a a in on apoB in the and based on as or with fibrate there in LDL-C increased the but not the lower decreases in and VLDL with and apoB not with fibrate apoB by but this change not not produce a in by with and The in particle number between and there a of VLDL which an of By with the in VLDL there a increase in LDL apoB from with the to with the The with with of in with and hypertriglyceridemia decreases in triglycerides and as well as in but no change in apoB but not A. M. R. et of plasma by and in Care. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). on the effect of on cardiovascular risk to be is to the to which the in lipid composition are of in particle in VLDL that apoB in with mutations of A.B. Frikke-Schmidt R. Nordestgaard B.G. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. mutations in and risk of ischemic J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), the that not fully the biological to be is an of The the between variants and coronary artery risk in a large of C. C. S. S. et and of and cardiovascular J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of variants lower triglyceride lower LDL-C and lower levels. a lower of coronary artery to atherosclerotic size in in triglycerides and LDL-C by and by on apoB et R. R. et and metabolic effects of J. PubMed Scopus Google demonstrated that that decreases in plasma triglycerides, LDL-C, and as well as in a in with and, therefore, LDL et R. M. et in J. PubMed Scopus Google that produce a in LDL and an effect that in these must be by a LDL In this the by et J. A. A. et of in plasma of lipoprotein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), that of in in apoB as well as increased are of which is by in plasma triglycerides and LDL-C, has been associated with mutations in P. A. et and in a with a rate of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. Peloso G.M. C. C. S. J. et and J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the that of LDL as well as VLDL levels and, therefore, benefit is to be by in triglycerides and relate more to in In multiple metabolic links VLDL and LDL but plasma triglycerides LDL-C reflect VLDL and LDL particle in cardiovascular risk associated with in plasma triglycerides in the of in LDL-C are not of apoB particle The assumption that if LDL-C is not affected, clinical benefit must relate to differences in plasma triglycerides is not if LDL-C is this may not reflect the of the on LDL there is no evidence that the of in cannot be for by of is that apoB not in of these However, the of apoB not that apoB not this the clinical of in cannot be reliably protein cholesterol ester transfer protein coronary heart HDL cholesterol LDL cholesterol VLDL cholesterol
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».