Study on Assembly Mechanics and Its Effect on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is an energy conversion device, which converts the chemical energy of fuels into electrical energy directly through electrochemical reactions, it has been considered as one of the most promising clean energy conversion devices widely because of its wide range of fuel sources, clean and free pollution, high operating current, can start-up quickly at room temperature and other advantages. All of components of a PEM fuel cell need to be assembled by exerting pressure from the outside, since the gas diffusion layer (GDL) is a porous structure and its elastic modulus is relatively small, during the process of exerting pressure, if the assembly pressure is too large, it will cause the GDL over deformation or even irreversible damage, thus reducing the gas transmission channel, increasing the mass transfer resistance, and even will damage the fuel cell components, shorten the lifetime of the fuel cell; in contrast, if the assembly pressure is too small, due to the poor contact between the bipolar plate and GDL, the contact resistance will increase, which will lead the reduce of the fuel cell efficiency, and the leak tightness of gas will not be guaranteed, there will be a risk of fuel gas leakage. In this paper, the numerical simulation method is used to simulatethe deformation of GDL under different assembly pressures, and the influence of transmission parameters such as GDL porosity and permeability caused by assembly pressure and its influence on the performance of PEMFC are studied in order to get the optimum pressure, making the best performance of PEMFC. The main work and achievements are as follows: The single channel PEMFC geometric model is established, and the numerical simulation is used to simulate, and the parameters such as porosity and permeability of PEMFC under different assembly pressures are calculated according to the empirical formula. When the assembly pressure from 0 to 3.0 MPa, the porosity decreased from the initial value of 0.78 to about 0.38; permeability also has an order of magnitude change; and the contact resistance decreases as the assembly pressure increases, but it decreases gradually; The finite element analysis (FEA) is used to analyze the effect of different assembly pressures on GDL deformation. The results show that, under the action of assembly pressure, the part of GDL, which under the bipolar plate ribs, will be deformed in different degrees, and the deformation on both sides is similar and obvious, the degree of deformation increases as the assembly pressure increases, while the part of GDL, which under the channel, is almost unchanged; Through the simulation, the distribution of the components concentration in the single channel PEMFC flow channel and the polarization curves under the assembly pressure are analyzed, and compares with different assembly pressures. Since the gas in the flow channel reacts in the catalyst layer, the gas concentration decreases along the flow direction under different assembly pressures. For the polarization curves, when the assembly pressure is between 0.5 to 1.0 MPa, the same operating voltage, the fuel cell current density is greater than the case of other pressures, and the fuel cell with the highest power under this pressure. Therefore, when the assembly pressure between 0.5-1.0 MPa, the single channel PEMFC performance is optimal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».