MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2803391773 · doi:10.1093/brain/awy140

Social communication in Tourette syndrome: a glimpse at the contribution of the insula and the prefrontal cortex

2018· letter· en· W2803391773 sur OpenAlexaff
Carmelo M. Vicario, Davide Martino

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrain · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInsulaPrefrontal cortexPsychologyNeuroscienceTourette syndromeCognitive psychologyPsychiatryCognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, We read with great interest the paper ‘Tourette syndrome: a disorder of the social decision-making network’, recently published in Brain (Albin, 2018). In this article, Albin explored the possibility that Tourette syndrome is characterized by neural abnormalities localized to several important brain regions associated with social behaviour and social decision-making. The author focused on several brain structures such as the amygdala, the periaqueductal grey, the hypothalamus, and basal ganglia, outlining key details on the relevance of these neural structures to support the view of this syndrome as disorder of social communication. Despite the growing body of evidence from psychometric studies (Eddy, 2018) showing abnormalities of social cognition in Tourette syndrome, the social behaviour dimension has been relatively under-explored. A core phenomenological feature of the Tourette spectrum is obscene (coprophenomena, e.g. coprolalia, coprographia and copropraxia) and non-obscene socially inappropriate behaviours (NOSIBs). Although social disinhibition appears to be a highly heritable symptom type within Tourette syndrome-related phenotypes (Hirschtritt et al., 2016), its association with a dysfunctional connectivity within the social behaviour network (SBN) has not been investigated in case-control studies. Brain imaging studies investigating the functional neuroanatomy of social behavioural anomalies are surprisingly scant and limited to single case studies. In Stern et al. (2000) the insular activity was particularly pre-eminent in a Tourette syndrome patient affected by coprolalia, whereas Gates et al. (2004) described a Tourette syndrome patient in whom coprolalia was associated with activation of the left middle frontal gyrus. As a complement to Albin’s thought-provoking view and in keeping with the findings from these isolated case studies, we believe it is interesting to expand the discussion to two further neural regions that are key components of the SBN, namely the insula and the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). A recent review of our group (Vicario et al., 2017) suggested that dysfunction of these two cortical regions has a central role in the pathogenesis of defects in social decision-making behaviours, such as moral reasoning and decision-making, across different neurological and psychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, the second most common behavioural comorbidity of Tourette syndrome. Importantly, the neural connectivity of both these regions is altered in Tourette syndrome (Jeffries et al., 2002; Müller-Vahl et al., 2009; Tinaz et al., 2015; Cavanna et al., 2017; Greene et al., 2017). Tinaz et al. (2015) used graph theory-based neural network analysis of resting state functional MRI data to demonstrate higher connectivity of the right dorsal anterior insula with urge- and tic-related cortico-striato-thalamic regions, as well as a positive correlation between functional connectivity between this portion of the insula and the supplementary motor area and severity of premonitory urges. This change of functional connectivity could affect social cognitive fitness besides influencing awareness and processing of bodily sensations. The insular cortex has been linked to affiliative behavioural patterns in an intracortical microstimulation study on non-human primates, with particular regard to social and communicative behaviour (Caruana et al., 2011). Moreover, a variety of orofacial motor programmes, crucial for social communication including affiliative behaviour, has been localized to the anterior and centro-ventral insular sectors (Jezzini et al., 2012). A body of human imaging studies exploring empathy for others’ pain have shown activations in the anterior insula, also involved in the direct experience of pain. This evidence supports the computational role of the anterior insula in processing emotionally charged states in order to guide adaptive, goal-directed behaviours in dynamic social contexts (Bernhardt and Singer, 2012). Kim et al. (2016) reported greater insular activation in response to tasks involving the Theory of Mind (ToM) dimension, i.e. the ability to think about mental states such as beliefs and emotions, a social cognition dimension, which is known to be affected in Tourette syndrome (Eddy et al., 2011). New imaging studies are therefore needed to understand which subdivisions of the insula are characterized by dysfunctional connectivity in Tourette syndrome, and how this relates to social cognition performance. In a recent, large voxel-based morphometry study, Greene et al. (2017) reported reduced white matter volume bilaterally in the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of Tourette syndrome patients. Different subregions of the orbital frontal cortex appear to be associated with different features of social cognition (Nestor et al., 2013). Moreover, in healthy subjects the volume of the orbital prefrontal cortex was found to correlate with the size of social networks (Powell et al., 2012). Shamay-Tsoory et al. (2007) also documented an impairment of the ‘affective’ subtype of the ToM dimension in association with dysfunctional connectivity of the vmPFC. Like for the insular region, more research is necessary to understand the correlation between structural and functional connectivity changes and social cognition performance in patients with Tourette syndrome. Overall, our considerations corroborate the hypothesis of a social communication deficit in Tourette syndrome, at the same time highlighting the importance to include the insula and the PFC as two key structures requiring exploration in future research on the social behaviour network of Tourette syndrome.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,736
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,801

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBrainMême sujetObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTravaux en français237 207