COMPARING WAIT TIMES OF SINGLE-MOTHER AND TWO-PARENT HOUSEHOLDS ACCESSING DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES THROUGH SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CLINICS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND Families in inner-city neighborhoods experience socioeconomic challenges that inhibit access to healthcare providers who could detect development concerns in children. Additionally, studies show low-income, single motherhood to be a significant risk factor for childhood developmental issues. With wait times for developmental assessments and publicly funded services ranging from 9 to 18 months, children may not receive diagnosis and support in a timely manner. School-based health clinics (SBHCs) are easy access points for children to receive necessary services, such as diagnoses and management of health and developmental concerns especially for inner city children facing barriers to health care access. OBJECTIVES To measure the efficacy of SBHCs in alleviating barriers to developmental services for children from inner-city, single-mother households, by comparing wait times to children from two-parent households. DESIGN/METHODS A retrospective chart review of 700 children from two inner-city SBHCs was conducted over 7 years. Family demographic data were collected through the registration process and analyzed. Wait times for developmental assessments were determined from the first developmental concern to assessment by a developmental paediatrician. Independent t-tests were used to compare wait times for children from single-mother households to children from two-parent households. RESULTS The mean age of children seen was 6.9 years (two-parent households) and 7.6 years (single-mother households). 35% of children from single-mother households (n=169), and 36% of children from two-parent households (n=369) received referrals to the SBHC developmental paediatrician. The mean wait times were 129.08 days for single-mother households, and 105.81 days for two-parent households. No significant difference was found in wait time from first developmental concern to seeing a developmental paediatrician (p>0.05). CONCLUSION The SBHC program is a novel healthcare delivery model alleviating barriers to developmental healthcare access for both single-mother and two-parent families. Wait times experienced by SBHC users to see developmental specialists were shorter than the times reported in the literature. The lack of significant difference in wait times between children from single-mother and two-parent households demonstrates how SBHCs alleviate barriers to single-mother households as effectively as two-parent households.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».