EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS BY CHILD REFUGEE CLAIMANTS AT A PEDIATRIC TERTIARY CARE CENTER
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND The Canadian government has announced the resettlement of 50 000 refugees from the Middle East by 2018. The proportion of refugees that are below 18 years of age have increased from 20% to almost 40% from 2005 to 2014 and is expected to increase further with new refugee influxes. Barriers to timely health care can worsen clinical presentations and outcomes, especially in vulnerable children such as refugees. This study aims to provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, hospital stay metrics, and non-clinical support needs for child refugee claimants presenting to the emergency department at a large tertiary care hospital in Canada. OBJECTIVES To describe the emergency department visits by refugee claimants with IFH, including demographics, primary care access, immunization status, acuity of presentation, repeat visits, and admission rates. DESIGN/METHODS A retrospective chart review of all refugee children presenting to the emergency department at this tertiary care hospital from April 1 2014 to March 31st 2017. A case was defined as a child who presented to the hospital with Interim Federal Health (IFH) which is the federal health insurance program covers newly arrived refugee claimants in Canada. Descriptive statistics and chi square test for categorical data was used. Data was analyzed using SPSS v21 IBM 2012. Ethics was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the hospital. RESULTS In total, there were 646 visits to the emergency department by 388 patients with IFH. The average age was 6.4 years (IQR 2.9–9.3), of which 58% were females. Travel history was documented in 65% of cases. The majority of patients arrived from Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The average time spent in Canada was 217 days (IQR 78–205). Sixty percent of patients did not have an identified primary care provider. Those with an identified primary care provider had more non-acute (CTAS 4–5) visits than those without an identified primary care provider (p<0.05). Immunizations were not up-to-date per Canadian standard in 25% of those who had an immunization history documented. Translation services was used in 11% of visits. Admission rate was 12%, with average length of stay 3.4 days (std 4). Top three reasons for admission were febrile neutropenia, respiratory distress, and blood per rectum. One fifth (20%) of admissions occurred on the same day as the arrival of the patient to Canada. CONCLUSION A significant number of refugee children are needing emergency care and admission to hospital on the day they arrive to Canada. Most child refugees presenting to the emergency department did not have an identified primary care provider, and a quarter did not have up-to-date immunizations. Association with primary care provider suggests that linkage to primary care in this population should be a priority.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».