Regulations of Cosmetics Across the Globe
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Cosmetics are products meant for cleaning, perfuming, beautifying, promoting attractiveness or altering the appearance on application to human body, without involving any physiological activity. In general, the term cosmetic includes a vast range of products mainly used for external care of the human body. To safeguard consumer’s health, each country has its guidance or regulations for cosmetic products. These regulations are legal tools for simplifying and reducing administrative work and ambiguities. </p> <p> Methods: We undertook a structured search of regulations available for cosmetic products in major countries. All countries have been selected basis their well developed and highly recommended regulations and guidance documents. All regulations have been studied and presented here in a comparative manner for their regulatory framework for cosmetics in Canada, United States, European Union and India. All information was collected from mentioned countries regulatory databases maintained and updated by authority of these countries and appropriate review literatures available online. </p> <p> Results: Regulations and guidelines have been studied thoroughly and appropriate information was included in the review through regulatory Authority website available on the internet. Majority of regulatory information for Canada, United States, European Union and India were available at website maintained by their respective authorities. In addition few review articles have been also consulted for introductory part of the manuscript. As per respective country regulations, Import, manufacture and sale procedures of cosmetics must be compliant with legislative regulatory system of respective country. Health Canada regulations on cosmetic products are mentioned in Food and Drugs Act and the Cosmetics Regulations. Cosmetics Notification, essential minimum labeling for consumers are few basic requirements that must be followed by manufacturers for Canadian market. Except for colour additives, United States, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) do not require cosmetic products and ingredients premarket approval. However, manufacturers are always advised to carry out necessary tests and establish safety of their product and all ingredients used in the preparation. New European Community Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 has replaced earlier Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC and other national provisions that were applicable to cosmetics. The Objective of new Regulation is to have a harmonized rule for all EU member countries. In India, cosmetics are regulated under the scope of Drugs and Cosmetics (D&C) Act 1940 and Rules 1945. </p> <p> Conclusion: The finding of this review is to conclude the comparative regulatory framework for cosmetic products with respect to applicable acts, regulations, ingredients, heavy metals, labeling, notification procedures etc. for different countries. Despite of many differences among these regulations, the availability of quality products in market is the prime objective of each country’s laws and regulations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,099 | 0,042 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».