PERSPECTIVES ON NEONATAL RESUSCITATION TRAINING IN A CANADIAN PEDIATRIC RESIDENCY PROGRAM: COMMUNITY VERSUS TERTIARY CARE EXPERIENCES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND The competencies involved in neonatal resuscitation include a thorough knowledge of transitional neonatal physiology as well as technical expertise, the ability to lead a multidisciplinary team, and appropriate management of resources. In Canadian paediatric training programs, residents acquire neonatal resuscitation competency in both community and tertiary care settings. There is limited literature regarding experiences of training in variable settings and no literature with respect to the integration of neonatal competency acquisition across training environments. OBJECTIVES To explore residents’ and recent paediatric graduates’ perspectives on acquisition of competencies and neonatal resuscitation training in community and tertiary care centers. DESIGN/METHODS This project employed an interpretive design qualitative methodology, using an a priori educational theory incorporating the principles of social cognitive theory, deliberate practice, distributive practice, and ‘choke phenomenon’. Semi structured focus groups of residents and paediatricians were used for data collection. Interpretive analysis in the style of Crabtree and Miller was employed. Data validity was optimized through member checking and triangulation of themes across investigators. Validity criteria as described by Lincoln and Guba were applied. Institutional ethics board approval was obtained. RESULTS Overall, the participants described a large ‘disconnect’ (lack of communication and congruence of curriculum) between community and tertiary training environments for neonatal resuscitation. Inherent challenges in the community included the variable skill and experience of the interdisciplinary team, availability of resources, and a lack of confidence in their own leadership. In addition, gaps in preceptor knowledge and communication were identified. Strengths of the community setting included: more autonomy for the learner, a high volume of clinical cases with particular emphasis on the ‘normal’; and opportunity for observed feedback with preceptors. In comparison, tertiary center experiences were perceived to be ‘overwhelming’ with a demanding workload and limited opportunity for direct observation and feedback from faculty. Strengths of the tertiary center experience included: variety and high volume of acute clinical cases, facilitating technical skill expertise and self-confidence; and a strong academic focus on physiology and knowledge translation. CONCLUSION Participants described both valuable opportunities and challenges for training and competency acquisition in neonatal resuscitation in tertiary and community settings. Integration of curricula or competencies across settings and across residency level of experience was lacking. This work suggests areas for collaboration within and across training centres to align opportunities in neonatal resuscitation competency training.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,019 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».