Prevalence of Chronic Pain and Its Association with Depression in Adult Patients Referring to Health Centers in Yazd
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Prevalence of Chronic Pain and Its Association with Depression in Adult Patients Referring to Health Centers in Yazd[1] Prevalence and correlates of suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts in people prescribed pharmaceutical opioids for ... [2] Chronic pain in the Japanese communityprevalence, characteristics and impact on ... [3] Relationship between depression and coping strategies in chronic back ... [4] Ethnic differences in the association between depression and chronic pain: Cross sectional ... [5] Depression and pain comorbidity: A literature ... [6] Chronic pain and comorbid mental health conditions: Independent associations of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression with pain, disability, and ... [7] Association of traumatic brain injury with chronic pain in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans: Impact of comorbid mental health ... [8] The relationship between chronic pain, social support, and depression in ... [9] Pilot feasibility study of a brief, tailored mobile health intervention for depression among patients ... [10] Understanding the link between depression and ... [11] Longitudinal associations between depression, anxiety, pain, and pain-related disability in chronic pain ... [12] Observing the effects of mindfulness-based meditation on anxiety and depression in chronic pain ... [13] The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on the rate of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing in women with chronic low ... [14] The roles of pain coping strategies in adjustment to chronic ... [15] Comparing the role of psychological ... [16] Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an ... [17] The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large ... [18] Effects of music therapy on anxiety, stress and depression of patients undergoing ... [19] Correlation between visual analogue scale and short form of McGill questionnaire in patients with chronic low ... [20] Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: Correlations and predictive value of ... [21] Depression: An important factor associated with disability among patients with chronic low ... [22] Comorbidity of chronic pain & depression and its treatment ... [23] Self-reported depression, anxiety and evaluation of own pain in clinical sample of patients with different location ... [24] Exploring the relationship between spirituality, coping, and ... [25] Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation ...Aims CP (Chronic pain) is a common problem that substantially impairs physical and psychological health and economic well-being.The aim of the present study was to c determine the prevalence of chronic pain and its association with depression in over 30-years-old clients referring to health centers.Instruments & Methods This descriptive study was conducted among 397 people from April to August 2015.The participants were the adults who came to governmental health centers in the province.These health centers were selected based on random sampling.Two health centers were located in Yazd and 4 were in the provincial cities DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale) was used to measure depression and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used to measure chronic pain.Six psychologists with a master's degree collected the data.The results were analyzed using Chi-square test by SPSS 23 software.Findings The prevalence of chronic pain was 66.8%.The highest prevalence of knee pain was 41.3%.The prevalence of depression was 67.5%.The relationship between chronic pain as an independent variable and dependent variable depression was significant (p=0.029). ConclusionThe prevalence of patients with chronic pain is 66.8%, and the prevalence of depression is reported 67.5%.There is a relationship between chronic pain and depression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».