17q21 variant increases the risk of exacerbations in asthmatic children despite inhaled corticosteroids use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Approximately 25% of the asthmatic children suffer from uncontrolled asthma despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).1 Variation within the 17q21 locus is the strongest genetic determinant for childhood-onset asthma.2 Recently, the influence of this locus on treatment outcomes has been shown in several studies.3, 4 The Pharmacogenomics in Childhood Asthma (PiCA) consortium is a multiethnic consortium that brings together data from ≥14 000 asthmatic children/young adults from 12 different countries to study the pharmacogenomics of uncontrolled asthma despite treatment.5 In 14 PiCA populations (with over 4000 asthmatic patients), we studied the association between variation in the 17q21 locus, and asthma exacerbations despite ICS use. We specifically focused on rs7216389, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the 17q21 locus strongly associated with childhood asthma and initially identified by Moffatt et al.2 Ten PiCA studies included patients with non-Hispanic European origins, two included Hispanic patients, one African American, and one included East Asian patients. Additional details of the study populations can be found in the Data S1. Two outcomes were assessed: (i) asthma-related hospitalizations/emergency department visit (ED) visits and (ii) short courses of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use reported by the parent/child at the study visit or based on completed study questionnaires. Age, gender, genotype data, and exacerbation data were available for 4529 steroid-treated children and young adults (Table 1). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of exacerbations when carrying rs7216389. Due to potential heterogeneity between cohorts, the odds ratios (ORs) were meta-analyzed with the inverse variance weighting method assuming random effects. See Data S1 for more detail. The risk allele (T) frequency was highest in East Asians (n = 182, T = 0.81), followed with African Americans (T = 0.79, n = 468) and Hispanics (T = 0.66, total n = 916), and it was less frequent in patients with European ancestry (ranged between 0.54 and 0.62, total n = 2963). The genotype distribution of the SNP was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in all cohorts. There was a low to moderate heterogeneity between studies (Figure 1). Exacerbation rates ranged between 6.5% (PACMAN) and 77.2% (HPR) for OCS use and 6% (PACMAN) and 58% (GALA II and HPR) for hospitalizations/ED visits. Thirty percent (1378 out of 4454) of the patients reported hospitalizations/ED visits. In the meta-analysis of 13 studies, rs7216389 was statistically significantly associated with asthma-related ED visits/hospitalizations, (summary OR per increase in risk allele: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.17- 1.49, P < .0001, I2 = 3.9%) (Figure 1A). In a subgroup analysis, the effect estimates for hospitalizations/ED visits were approximately the same for both non-Hispanic whites (n = 2888, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10-1.61, P = .004, I2 = 30.2%) and Hispanics (n = 916, OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.06-1.63, P = .01, I2 = 0.00%). Thirty-one percent (1269 out of 4050) of the patients reported OCS use/high-dose ICS. In the meta-analysis of the nine studies, the rs7216389-T was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of OCS use/high-dose ICS (summary OR per increase in variant allele: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36, P = .01, I2 = 22.8%) (Figure 1B). Rs7216389 was associated with OCS use in the meta-analysis of seven European studies (n = 2492, OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09-1.45, P = .002, I2 = 6.2%) but not in Hispanics (n = 916, OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76-1.22, P = .7, I2 = 0.00%). Differences in the minor allele frequencies and LD structures among different ethnicities can influence results of the association studies.6 This could be one of the potential explanations why we did not find a significant association in African Americans and patients from Singapore. A sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate this association in children ≥5 years of age. When excluding children <5 years of age in the meta-analysis, the results remained significant. In the meta-analysis of 13 studies, the SNP was associated with asthma-related hospitalization/ED visits (n = 4254, OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.18-1.49, P < .0001, I2 = 0.0%) (Figure S1). Regarding OCS use, 10 studies collected data on patients ≥5 years of age (n = 3771). In the meta-analysis of 10 studies, rs7216389 was associated with the OCS use (summary OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.38, P = .01, I2 = 21.7%) (Figure S2). We also performed a meta-analysis of the studies that had sufficient data available on preschool children (2-4 years of age). Although the effect estimates in younger children were in the same direction for both outcomes, the results were not statistically significant (Figures S3 & S4). All preschool studies solely included European children. Altered expression of ORMDL3 and GSDMB by 17q21 locus variants may play a key role in childhood asthma onset.2, 7 Two 17q21 asthma-risk variants (rs4065275 and rs12936231) in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs7216389 were reported to switch CTCF-binding sites that resulted in increased expression of ORMDL3 in CD4+ T cells which subsequently reduced interleukin-2 production.8 Rs7216389 has previously shown to be associated with exacerbations3 and poor lung function in Caucasian children using ICS.4 Even though in our study Caucasians were the largest group, this study is the largest multiethnic population evaluating the association between 17q21 variant and asthma exacerbations in ICS users. Rs7216389 seems to increase bronchial responsiveness and therefore exacerbation rates in children,9 suggesting that carriers of rs7216389 might have a more severe form of asthma. However, by adding British Thoracic Society (BTS) treatment steps as a marker of disease severity to the model, we argue that the association reflects, at least partly, poor response to ICS. Limitations of the study include the use of retrospective reporting of exacerbations in the observational cohort studies. However, the effect was also observed in a clinical trial population (CAMP), where exacerbations were reported prospectively. Hence, we do not believe that using retrospective data has significantly influenced the results. As not all studies had data available on both hospitalizations/ED visits and OCS use, we did not combine the two outcomes in our analysis. Furthermore, as information on treatment adherence was not available in all included studies, it was not considered in the analysis. We show that 17q21, a widely replicated asthma susceptibility locus, is also associated with an increased risk of exacerbations in children/young adults treated with ICS. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying exacerbation-prone phenotype of pediatric asthma could lead to a better classification of different pediatric asthma phenotypes and the identification of novel treatment targets. AHM reports an unrestricted research grant from GSK, during the conduct of the study; she was a member of an advisory board for AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. MP-Y reports grants from Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (RYC-2015-17205), from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII, AC15/00015), and from ERACoSysMed 1st Joint Transnational Call (SysPharmPedia), during the conduct of the study. NHP reports grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and cofunded by the European Social Funds from the European Union (ESF) “ESF invests in your future”, during the conduct of the study. KGT reports grants from U.S. National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study. SJV reports grants from Stichting Astma bestrijding, during the conduct of the study; and PACMAN cohort was funded by a strategic alliance between Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences and GSK. The other authors have no other conflict of interests that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».