MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2806378406 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy044

Five steps to: Paediatric vision screening

2018· article· en· W2806378406 sur OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Y. Lee, Nirojini Sivachandran, Gloria Isaza

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOphthalmology and Visual Health Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOptometryMedicineComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paediatric vision screening is an important component of well-child visits to detect and refer vision threatening conditions. Over 80% of a child’s learning is based on vision, and good vision is crucial for both physical and emotional development (1). Untreated visual abnormalities in childhood cause permanently reduced visual acuity (VA) (amblyopia) (2). Recent studies suggest that the prevalence of poor vision in the Canadian elementary school population is at least 16.1% (3). Further, evidence suggests that medical graduates do not feel adequately trained or comfortable performing ocular examinations (4,5). The objective of this article is to provide a quick and straightforward approach to paediatric vision screening with practical tips that are easy to remember using the mnemonic PROVE. It is intended for residents and staff physicians in various settings (i.e., emergency department, family medicine clinic, paediatrician’s office) to identify any vision threatening conditions, and make appropriate and timely referrals. Please refer to the online version of this document for a video explaining the five steps to paediatric vision screening. This video file is available online. Prepare a good fixation target. Children are often uncooperative and have a difficult time fixating. Generally, large, bright toys or videos of the child’s favourite show on a phone or tablet work well. Be quick! Children have short attention spans. Thus, it is important to finish the exam efficiently. Use light last. It can be distressing to some children. The chances of finishing the screening will be less once the child starts crying. Involve the parents. Ensure they are in the room and able to comfort the child. Be creative, playful, and make the exam fun. For instance, if a toy is being used as the fixation target, make a story related to it (i.e., “Look it’s Dora, where is she going?”). Mnemonic – Remember ‘PROVE’ Pupils Red reflex Ocular Alignment Vision Assessment External Ocular Examination Note: The mnemonic is simply an aid to remember the essential components of a paediatric screening exam. The ocular exam should be performed in reverse order of the mnemonic (as listed below) to have the components of the exam with light sources directly aimed at the eye performed last (i.e., external ocular examination first and pupils last). Use a light source to examine various parts of the eye including eyelids, orbit, sclera, conjunctiva, iris and cornea. Look for asymmetry, identify any surface irregularities such as lumps and bumps, and help diagnose any sight-threatening disorders such as congenital glaucoma (i.e., corneal clouding, epiphora [tearing], buphthalmos [enlarged eye]) and amblyopia (caused by sensory deprivation, i.e., ptosis or cataract). Any abnormal finding(s) should be referred. To begin, questions on history such as ‘Is your child able to reach out to or grab objects?’ or ‘Does your child bump into walls?’ can help assess any concerns with vision or stereopsis. Vision assessment in children will vary based on age (1). Assessment of VA cannot begin prior to 3 to 4 months of age as the fovea has not completely matured (3). Other parts of the ocular exam, however, can be performed such as red reflex and external ocular exam. In preverbal or nonverbal children VA can be assessed using the central, steady, maintained (CSM) method (6). This is performed by assessing the following three components: 1) Is the corneal light reflex central (C) and symmetrical in both eyes? 2) Is fixation steady under monocular conditions i.e. no evidence of latent nystagmus when contralateral eye is occluded? and 3) Is fixation maintained? The child must be able to fix and follow a target (generally a few seconds). Tip: An important clue to amblyopia during CSM testing in younger children would be a child’s resistance to covering of one eye more than the other (i.e., occlusion behaviour), this should prompt a referral. For those over 3 years of age, VA charts can be used. Picture charts and matching charts (i.e., HOTV) can be helpful in preliterate children. For those who can read letters, a Snellen or ETDRS chart can be used. VA less than 20/40 (depending on age, see Table 1) and significant asymmetry (two lines on chart) between eyes at any age are concerning and warrant a referral (3). Tip: Ensure that the child is not peeking or memorizing if using VA charts. Canadian Paediatric Society vision screening recommendations at infant and well-child visits Data taken from ref. (1). *For high risk newborns (i.e., prematurity). †With age appropriate charts as outlined in the article. ‡After 5 years of age, they should be examined with routine health examination or as complaints occur. Canadian Paediatric Society vision screening recommendations at infant and well-child visits Data taken from ref. (1). *For high risk newborns (i.e., prematurity). †With age appropriate charts as outlined in the article. ‡After 5 years of age, they should be examined with routine health examination or as complaints occur. Alignment can be assessed quickly using the corneal light reflex. The child fixates on a target, and light will be directed at both eyes at midline from 0.5 to 1.0 m away. The corneal light reflex should be at the slightly nasal to the centre of each pupil. If the light reflex is off centre, it may imply a misalignment of the eye (strabismus). The cover tests are additional tests to measure ocular alignment (7). The presence of a misalignment (i.e., strabismus) warrants a referral. These tests are done on both eyes while the child fixates on a target (7). The cover test reveals a manifest deviation (tropia). One eye is occluded, and the uncovered (tested) eye is checked for correction from deviated position to fixation. If the eye moves from outward to central for fixation, then the child has an exotropia and if the eye moves from inward to central then the child has esotropia. The alternate cover test reveals total deviation (manifest plus latent deviation). Provide a fixation target and cover each eye for 1 to 2 seconds, while moving the cover back and forth between each eye observe the unoccluded eye for any movement to central position. Some children will have poor fusional mechanisms that keep the eyes straight, and this can be made apparent with the alternate cover test. Any misalignment noted should be referred for further workup as strabismus can lead to amblyopia. The ophthalmoscope is directed at the eye individually 50 cm away from the patient in a dark room (5). The red reflex should be bright, red and symmetric between the two eyes. Abnormal findings (i.e., dark spots, diminished or increased reflex, white reflex [leukocoria] and asymmetry) can implicate any of the structures of the visual pathway, or indicate high or asymmetric refractive error, and should invoke referral for further workup. Using a bright light source check for equal, reactive and consensual responses of pupils in light and in dark. Using swinging flashlight test check for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Swing the light between one eye to the next at 1 Hz. Each time the light hits the pupil, it should constrict. If, for example, the left pupil dilates when swung from right to left, there is a left RAPD. The presence of a RAPD indicates a unilateral or asymmetrical pathology of the retina or optic nerve, which should prompt a referral. In cases of irregular shape or unequal pupils (anisocoria), the child should be referred for further workup. If the anisocoria is less than 1 mm and there are no other ocular abnormalities, it is likely to be physiologic in nature, which accounts for 20% of anisocoria (4). Tip: Pupils can also be assessed while viewing the red reflex through a direct ophthalmoscope (i.e., look for shape and symmetry). None.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,079

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,039
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,003
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0050,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0130,025
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,397 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchTravaux en français237 207