MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W280685267 · doi:10.1177/070674370505001103

A Memoir of a Sojourn as Editor of <i>The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry</i>

2005· article· en· W280685267 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Edward Kingstone

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueMedical Research and Practices
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemoirPsychologyPsychiatryPsychoanalysisMedicineHistoryArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I am delighted and honoured to be part of the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the publication of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. It is also an honour to accompany the recollections of former editors Fred Lowy and Quentin Rae-Grant. One of my enduring memories of my time as editor was the assistance that I could call on from members of the Canadian psychiatric community, the Editorial Board, and the previous editor, Fred Lowy. My time as editor, which spanned more than a decade and a half, was a period of activity, work, and fulfillment. Let me first discuss the structure of the Journal and its relation to the Association as it was when I started and as it was when I left. To begin with, the editor had full control over what happened at the Journal: a glass wall existed between the Journal and the Association, although both bodies occupied small offices in an area about the size of a 1 - or 2-bedroom apartment on the ground floor of a small apartment house-cumoffice building in the centre of Ottawa. I must point out that the Association itself was still quite young and feeling its way, numbers in psychiatry had not yet begun to swell, and the place of psychiatry in medicine was still being worked out and was often felt to be problematic. Where editorial issues were concerned, the relation between the Journal and the Board was always cordial and respectful. That is to say, the Association never took any sort of proprietary approach to material published in the Journal. The Board chair at the time was Stan Greben, and he always respected our autonomy. Next in line were the managing editor of the Journal and the executive secretary of the Association. A certain amount of jostling went on as to whether the Association's executive had a supervisory position vis-a-vis the Journal. However, this never affected the editorial process. My predecessor, Fred Lowy, gave me several insights into the relation between the Journal and the Association. Fred told me that, despite any disputes with the Association, there was never any attempt to influence the Journal 's direction, policy, and decisions. In all the years during which I was associated with the Journal and the Association, this continued to be true-which is not to say that this relatively hands-off policy kept the Board chair, the president, other members of the Association, and the executive director from giving advice. Moreover, that advice was almost always positive. In addition to our managing editor, we had an assistant who acted as a copy reader as well as a secretary. There was also a book review editor who was chosen from Ottawa because of the need to visit the office and assign book reviews. When I began my tenure as editor, the Journal dimensions were less than three-quarters those of the current publication, and there was little variation in the cover colour. No headlines appeared on the cover, which was, as I recall, a conservative grey. The matter of the publication's size preoccupied the creative efforts of the editor, the managing editor, and the printing house. The current dimensions were finally adopted to position the Journal as a contemporary journal. With a change in dimensions, its appearance became more consistent with that of other evolving journals. The increased size also improved the readability of figures and tables. As well, the name was changed. The Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, La Revue de l'Association des Psychiatres du Canada became The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie. The name change was accomplished without any difficulty and introduced at the beginning of the publishing year. In time, cover space was used to identify and highlight an issue's articles and themes; small changes followed in accordance with evolving trends in the field of publishing. For a long time, a big problem was the need to have the Journal 's cover appear in consistent colours from issue to issue; for some reason this was not an easy task, but eventually, standardization was achieved. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,071
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: Évaluation · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,988
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,111

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,071
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,009
Communication savante0,0180,007
Science ouverte0,0040,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0100,023
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,403
Écart entre enseignants0,364 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
DomaineÉvaluation
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Même sujetMedical Research and Practices→Travaux en français237 207→