Mountains, Molehills and Mediation: Exploring the Affordances, the Drawbacks and the Facilitation of Presence Via Face-to-Face Communication and Texting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis explores how social and corporeal presence is facilitated via texting and faceto-face communication.Face-to-face communication is considered to be the preferred means of communication among many scholars due to its sensorial, co-present, humanbased means of exchanging physical and social presence.While face-to-face communication is an undeniable form of live presence, it shares certain contextual drawbacks with other means of interaction.Texting is but another form of communication that facilitates social presence via the disembodied machine rather than the physical being itself.With the popularity of texting as a means of social interaction in the 21 st century, it is important to acknowledge that despite its appeal, texting bears both negative and positive attributes.Drawing upon previous theoretical and statistical research from scholars within the fields of communication, psychology, philosophy, media studies, sociology and linguistics, the findings of this research suggest that from one angle talking face-to-face is a primordial and essential means of communicating for humans in order to acquire social skills and too much dependence on texting can lead to lower emotional receptiveness.Additionally, both young and old find using new media to communicate overwhelming.From an oppositional angle studies suggest that texting enables overseas workers to feel empowered.Texting is also deemed to be of particular benefit to those in the deaf community, for it is an inclusive, non-discriminatory means of interaction.Ultimately, this thesis illustrates how one is the ruler of one's own actions.It is the individual who is responsible for understanding the contextual strengths and weaknesses of each respective means of communication.communication.The overall scope of my research is to study how the human in communication is maintained through texting and face-to-face communication.In both instances, messages are external expressions of internal thoughts, which cannot be articulated perfectly.Ultimately, my intention is to discuss the nature of my research through a theoretical approach in which I use secondary sources.The reason for this approach is because it is broad and enables me to look at material through a theoretical lens and an empirical lens.Conducting my research through this methodological approach provided me with a number of contemporary and classic theories, studies and philosophies.These in-depth works granted me the opportunity to produce a body of work rich in theory and data ranging from sociology, psychology and media studies.Through the interconnected nature of my thesis, I was able to meet the objective of my research by virtue of exploring more than one approach to the facilitation of presence and how the human in communication is maintained.The depth of this approach to collecting secondary sources of empirical and theoretical scholarship is reminiscent of the objective of the thesis itself, which is to take two opposing entities and study how they contrast and how they correlate.Similarly, even though theoretical literary analysis and empirical research are different forms of methodological approaches, they both work to identify answers to my research question.Through this method of analysis, I learned from a number of angles, all of which suggest
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».