MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2807514478 · doi:10.7939/r3057d133

The Neural Correlates of Culture, Sociality, and Attention to Context

2016· article· en· W2807514478 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew Russell

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSocialityContext (archaeology)CommunicationPsychologyCognitive psychologyBiologyEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent cultural psychological theory proposes that social orientation differences lead to general differences in attention. Whereas independent cultures (i.e., European Canadians) are thought to see the self as separate from its context, or more generally, process the world analytically and separate objects from their context, interdependent cultures (i.e., Japanese) are thought to see the self as dependent on its surrounding context, or more broadly, have a holistic view of the world and embed objects in their context. Further examining the relationship between culture and attention, I investigated the neural correlates of attention with event related potentials (ERPs) for non-social and social tasks, comparing European Canadian and Japanese participants. I begin this thesis by conceptualizing culture and important cultural frameworks related to current social orientation theory (Chapter 1). I then introduce my research investigating the neural correlates of culture and attention for non-social memory (Chapter 2). Using analytic attention instructions, I asked participants to judge, and later, remember, target animals that were paired with task-irrelevant original (congruent) or novel (incongruent) contexts. I investigated: 1) whether the N400 ERP wave would show an incongruity effect for both cultures, due to retrieved contexts conflicting with later-shown novel contexts, and 2) whether the incongruity effect would more strongly predict performance for Japanese, i.e., reflecting more difficulty ignoring contexts in Japanese. Results showed that both groups exhibited N400 incongruity effects, with Japanese showing more typical N400 topographies. However, incongruent-trial accuracy was only related to a reduction of N400s in Japanese. In Chapter 3, I then investigated the neural correlates of culture and social attention. As a basis for this research, previous behavioral and eye-tracking findings had shown that interdependent cultures tend to be more influenced than independent cultures by background social information. To investigate early attention patterns, I collected ERPs during a task where participants were asked to rate the emotions of central persons within five person emotion lineups. Lineups were either congruent, with all faces showing similar emotions, or incongruent, with central face emotions differing from background face emotions. The behavioral results replicated previous findings, showing that Japanese participants’ ratings were more influenced by background information than European Canadians’. The ERP data also revealed an influence from social incongruence for Japanese, showing increased processing for incongruent lineups (than congruent lineups) in early (the N400) and later (the LPC) semantic ERPs. Such ERP incongruity effects were not seen for European Canadians. Individuals’ independence social orientation beliefs also related to these incongruity effects: Independence social orientation beliefs moderated the two cultures’ early processing patterns. A negative relationship emerged between independence and European Canadians’ N400 incongruity effects, which was not observed in Japanese. Furthermore, Independence social orientation beliefs were negatively related with both groups’ later LPC-based incongruity effects. In addition, while European Canadians did not show N400 or LPC incongruity effects, they still showed evidence of noticing social incongruence through N2 incongruity effects. Together these findings give evidence that social orientation differences also affect early social attention neural patterns. Next in Chapter 4, I investigated how culture and relationship context affect social attention. For this investigation, I collected ERP data during a task where face emotion lineups were deemed to be in close or acquaintance relationships. For neural patterns, I replicated Chapter 3’s findings for acquaintances, with only Japanese showing N400 incongruity effects. Contrasting with these patterns, only European Canadians showed N400 incongruity effects for close relationships. I also replicated Chapter 3’s findings for N2 incongruity effects; European Canadians noticed incongruent social context, evidenced by N2 incongruity effects, regardless if they had N400s or not. In contrast, I found that Japanese had both N2s and N400s or neither. Regarding relationships with cultural beliefs, social orientation beliefs only significantly correlated with N2 incongruity effects for acquaintances. Together these findings suggest that social orientation differences that have been related to attention may be stronger tied to acquaintance relationships. To close, in Chapter 5, I discuss the results of my three studies and implications for our understanding of culture, attention, and social orientation, and discuss neuroscience’s place in cultural psychology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta Library→Même sujetNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies→Travaux en français237 207→