The social-psychological process involved in using human patient simulators as a teaching/learning modality in undergraduate nursing education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The use of the high-fidelity human patient simulator (HPS) based clinical scenario in undergraduate nursing education is a powerful learning tool well suited to modern students’ preference for immersive construction of knowledge through the provision of contextually rich reality-based practice and social discourse. To date there has been little indication of research into the social processes in which students engage in a simulated clinical session. The purpose of this paper-based thesis was to explore these social-psychological processes that occur within HPS-based clinical scenarios to inform nurse educators’ choice of pedagogical practices when they structure and implement this technology-based learning tool. This exploration began with the first manuscript, which explores this approach to clinical teaching through a critical examination of the application of behaviorist and constructivist pedagogy to high-fidelity scenario-based simulation sessions. The second manuscript critically analyzes the role of clinical scenarios using human patient simulation in promoting transformative learning events in undergraduate nursing education. The third manuscript begins with the assertion that HPS-based learning experiences are in reality social endeavors that serve as a platform for social discourse among learning groups and follows with an analysis of the theoretical and philosophical foundations of the grounded theory research method, demonstrating its suitability to uncovering the social processes within. Finally, the dissertation process culminated in the fourth manuscript, which is a report on a grounded theory study that explored the social-psychological processes that occur within HPS-based clinical scenarios. This study sampled students and faculty from a Western Canadian baccalaureate nursing program. The data collection consisted of semistructured interviews, supplemented by secondary data from the observation of participants as they engaged in HPS-based clinical scenarios, field notes, analytical and operational memos, and journaling. The process of leveled coding generated a substantive theory that has the potential to enable educators to empower students through the use of fading support, a twofold process comprised of adaptive scaffolding and dynamic assessment that challenges students to realistically self-regulate and transform their frame of reference for nursing practice, while at the same time limiting the threats that traditional HPS-based curriculum can impose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».