MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2807895486 · doi:10.1104/pp.18.00313

Adjusting Boron Transport by Two-Step Tuning of Levels of the Efflux Transporter BOR1

2018· letter· en· W2807895486 sur OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Julkowska

Notice bibliographique

RevuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Établissements canadiensKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEffluxTransporterBoronChemistryBiophysicsCell biologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Boron is an essential plant micronutrient with the narrowest optimal range in the soil of any micronutrient. At neutral pH, boron is present as uncharged boric acid, B(OH)3, which can freely penetrate membranes. Boron plays an important role in cross-linking cell wall components, but boron starvation and toxicity affect various metabolic and physiological processes beyond cell wall reinforcement (Reid, 2010). Controlling boron transport is therefore in the best interest of developing plants. Under boron-starvation conditions, boron uptake and mobilization toward the shoot is facilitated by the transporters NIP5;1 and BOR1. NIP5;1 is only expressed in the outer root layer, enhancing permeability of boron and passive boron uptake from the soil (Takano et al., 2010). BOR1 is a boron efflux transporter expressed in multiple cell layers of the root. In the endodermis, BOR1 polar localization toward the vasculature ensures efficient boron mobilization to the shoot (Takano et al., 2010). Under boron-sufficient conditions, BOR1 undergoes ubiquitination and degradation, reducing boron concentrations in the shoot (Kasai et al., 2011). However, intracellular boron levels decreased under boron-toxic conditions, even in lines expressing BOR1 with a mutated ubiquitination site (K590A), suggesting the existence of another mechanism controlling BOR1 levels. Now, an article by Aibara et al. (2018) published in the current issue of Plant Physiology describes another mechanism of BOR1 regulation by its own 5′ untranslated region (UTR). The authors identified four untranslated open reading frames (uORFs) in the 5′UTR of the BOR1 mRNA. Using reporter gene constructs containing a truncated BOR1 5′UTR and with the start codon AUG replaced with AAG for each uORF, the authors found that the two uORFs closest to the start codon of BOR1 have a role in regulating boron-dependent activity of the reporter gene. The boron-dependent effect of the 5′UTR on reporter gene activity was also observed in vitro using wheat germ extract. These results suggested that high levels of boron might directly interfere with the translation of BOR1. The two uORFs closest to the start codon affected the rate of translational reinitiation, as shortening the distance between the last uORF and the main ORF abolished boron-dependent activity of the reporter gene. One potential mechanism underlying this effect on reinitiation of translation is that toxic levels of boric acid might reduce formation of ternary complexes (TCs), which are necessary for reinitiating translation. TCs are composed of GTP-bound eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 (eIF2) and Met-bound tRNA. In yeast, toxic boron conditions enhanced phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eIF2, reducing the formation of TCs (Uluisik et al., 2011). Under boron-toxic conditions, presumably when the levels of TC are low, the distance between the last two uORFs and the BOR1 start codon prevent the reassembly of the translational machinery and reduce translation of BOR1. This mechanism of boron-dependent translational repression is, thus far, unique to BOR1 and possibly to its orthologs in other species. Other boron transporters regulated by 5′UTRs include NIP5;1, but the mechanisms regulating these transporters rely on ribosome stalling at the uORF (Tanaka et al., 2016), which did not occur in the 5′UTR of BOR1. The described 5′UTR uORF-mediated mechanism of decreased BOR1 translation occurs at toxic levels of boron, indicating a stepwise control of boron transport. Boron accumulation varies along the longitudinal root axis (Shimotohno et al., 2015), and levels of BOR1 are reduced in the exodermis, but not in the endodermis, of rice (Oryza sativa) roots grown under boron-sufficient conditions, compared with roots grown under boron starvation (Nakagawa et al., 2007). The proposed two-step control of BOR1 levels (Fig. 1) could operate simultaneously in different cell types varying in boron accumulation. Implementing this two-step control mechanism in models will help to explain cell type-specific regulation of boron transport under boron-sufficient and toxic conditions. The two-step control of BOR1 levels. The translation of the BOR1 mRNA under boron toxic conditions is inhibited by the presence of the uORFs at the 5′UTR of BOR1 mRNA. The two uORFs most proximal to the BOR1 start codon reduce translation reinitiation, thereby reducing the translation rates of BOR1. At sufficient boron levels, the BOR1 protein undergoes ubiquitination followed by protein degradation. In the natural environment, boron toxicity co-occurs with salt stress (Reid, 2010). Interestingly, high levels of boron can alleviate the symptoms of salt stress by promoting the recovery of cell wall stiffness, as recently described for the feronia mutant (Feng et al., 2018). Evaluation of BOR1 activity in the context of boron and salinity stress would be an important contribution for plant breeding efforts for regions where those two stresses limit plant productivity. Additionally, the exploration of the two-step mechanism of BOR1 control could shed light on boron sensitivity of agronomically important plants. Overexpression of BOR1(K590A), which exhibits weaker polar localization in the endodermis, enhanced tolerance to high boron concentrations (Wakuta et al., 2016). The BOR1-like 5′UTR uORFs limiting the translation at high boron concentrations present in boron transporters with nonpolar localization could unveil factors limiting boron tolerance. The discovery of this two-step regulation of boron transporter reveals not only an elegant mechanism of boron transport control that depends on boron levels, but also unleashes new possibilities for strategies to breed for enhanced boron tolerance.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYMême sujetPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsTravaux en français237 207