MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2807989326

Gazing back: A feminist postcolonial lens on tourism in the townships of South Africa

2018· dissertation· en· W2807989326 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meghan Muldoon

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTourismLens (geology)Through-the-lens meteringGender studiesGeographyOptometrySociologyMedia studiesEngineeringArchaeologyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Encountering poverty in tourism is a morally fraught experience. Growing numbers of tourists are desirous of exploring off-the-beaten path adventures and this invariably leads to encounters with the Other in increasingly far-flung and improbable locales. As countries of the Majority World – where the majority of the world’s poor live – continue to host ever-increasing numbers of tourist arrivals (UNWTO, 2017), the potential of tourism to play a role in the alleviation of poverty is an alluring prospect.
\nDespite its economic potential, the postcolonial nature of many touristic encounters in the Majority World, as well as the very tangible harm that some forms of tourism have brought to the world’s poor, have caused many critical scholars to question the assertion that tourism may bring net-benefits to people living in poverty. Further, colonialized discourses of the exoticized Other, circulated through tourism marketing and the popular media, create essentialized images that inform tourists’ interactions with tourism hosts while traveling in the global South.
\nGuided by a feminist postcolonial theoretical framework, the purpose of this thesis research was to learn about how hosts gaze back at the tourists that spend time in the townships of South Africa where they live. Constructed as racialized spaces of economic and geographic segregation during apartheid, townships in South Africa continue to be homogenously black or coloured spaces characterized by poor infrastructure, inadequate housing, and economic marginalization. Following the end of apartheid, however, townships have also come to be demarcated as spaces of resistance and courage, of historical significance and triumph over oppression. It is into these spaces that a growing number of tourists choose to venture, travelling the streets of the townships on foot, on bicycles, or in vans.
\nEmploying a photovoice methodology for the purposes of this study, I gave digital cameras to 14 men and women living in three black townships on the outskirts of Cape Town and asked them to take photographs of how tourism is and how tourism ought to be. Through the photographs that they chose to share, participants spoke about the economic and social benefits that encounters with tourism had brought to their lives. They also spoke to the complex ways in which tourism to the townships is embedded within existing structures of race, class, gender, and postcolonial aftermaths. Employing a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis, I strove to understand how relationships of power, embedded within these structures, inform the ways in which township residents conceptualize and seek out encounters with tourism.
\nComplicating this narrative was my presence in the townships as a white/Canadian/tourist/researcher. The narratives that were shared with me were filtered through the lens of my embodied presence, and led me to explore my own situatedness and biases through a number of reflexive research practices. This thesis analyzes the ways in which relationships of power based in race, gender, mobilities, colonial narratives, and financial resources inform touristic encounters in the townships of Cape Town, South Africa. This work contributes to the field of critical tourism and leisure studies by advancing our understandings of how tourism is conceptualized as powerful in a multitude of ways by tourism hosts in a unique part of the Majority World.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,181
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,951

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207