MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2808478092 · doi:10.1002/wmh3.269

Addressing Women's Health

2018· article· en· W2808478092 sur OpenAlex
Arnauld Nicogossian, Bonnie Stabile, Otmar Kloiber, Edward Septimus

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Medical & Health Policy · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSex and Gender in Healthcare
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHealth careGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)Global healthPopulationFamily medicineClinical trialAlternative medicinePublic healthGerontologyNursingPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Disparities in women's health and health care increasingly fuel concerns, prompt studies, and advance international policies. The World Medical Association has consistently highlighted the need to address inequities in women's health care, and the World Health Organization continues to include improvements to women and children's health prominently among its goals (World Health Organization, 2009 2018; World Medical Association, 2002, 2008). Until recently, women's health suffered from a void in knowledge to appropriately inform practice and medical policies (Institute of Medicine, 2010), despite the fact that women represent the largest segment of the world population. Until the post-World War II era, male subjects were exclusively used in animal or human biomedical experiments and drug trials. The results of these studies were extrapolated to female, elderly, and child patients. For example, common medications used in men were administered to children, but in smaller doses, and aspirin was administered to women to prevent heart attacks. does not now have appropriate management systems to monitor how many women are in clinical trials, to be assured that NDAs and IND annual reports are in compliance with pertinent regulations for presenting outcome data by sex and tabulating the number of women included in ongoing trials, or to confirm that its medical officers have adequately addressed sex-related issues in their reviews. While FDA has taken some promising initial steps to address these deficiencies, it is important that the agency finalize the pilot programs it has underway and give sustained attention to these management issues. (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2001, pp. 19–20) The figure below highlights further global socioeconomic, physical, and medical obstacles to delivering adequate health care to women. For centuries, the focus on women's health was limited to “reproductive health.” Women of all ages have also historically been disproportionately subjected to abuse and neglect. Providing preventive care to women, and reducing disparities and violence (including human trafficking) will contribute a long way to ensuring healthy and productive life spans for women. A major policy objective to achieve this goal is an aggressive literacy program for women (including health literacy). These considerations are included in the WHO millennium goals. Health-care funding and access are, of course, influenced by politics. An evidence-based approach to health-care delivery for all men, women, and children, without the influence of prejudice or personal convictions, is a major driver to ensure effective patient care and disease prevention. Continued debates over rationing health-care services, ensuring universal access, reproductive rights, and social justice in medicine are political discussions that influence policy. Acknowledging and addressing the difference between opinions and evidence in these debates is essential to appropriately informing and educating individuals on risks and outcomes in health care. Health literacy and education of the public are essential for better health care, lifestyle choices, and family security, particularly for women. Cultural, societal, and ethical values play a significant role in the formulation of policies dealing with health and medical practice and should be all inclusive of race, age, and sex. No individual should be excluded from participation in informed health-care decisions or access. The WHO charter for health promotion produced in 1986 in Ottawa defined health as, “a resource for everyday life, not the objective of living. Health is a positive concept emphasizing social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities” (World Health Organization, 1986). Sex, female or male, matters in health and disease. Male and female bodies react differently to the same stimuli. Sex differences manifest in the function of many bodily organs, beyond the reproductive and genitourinary systems, including the brain, musculo-skeletal system, heart, and lungs. Additional interdisciplinary research is required to recognize these differences. More information is needed in the areas of pain and pharmacodynamics of medications, central nervous system (CNS) functioning, digestive tract, and immune system responses to environmental stresses and challenges. World Medical & Health Policy is committed to addressing health issues related to sex and gender. Under the leadership of Professor Stabile, co-editor of World Medical & Health Policy, The Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, along with the Policy Studies Organization, is supporting a biennial workshop dedicated to Women's Health in Global Perspective. Many of the participants have the opportunity to publish excellent papers in World Medical & Health Policy (Stabile & Nicogossian, 2016, 2017). The second successful workshop was held in March 2018, and the editors look forward to receiving additional manuscripts to advance knowledge and thought, and improve policy, with regard to women's health.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,802
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,178
Tête enseignante GPT0,522
Écart entre enseignants0,344 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle