MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2808572601 · doi:10.1353/ams.2018.0006

Martyrs Mirror: A Social History by David L. Weaver-Zercher

2018· article· en· W2808572601 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca Barrett-Fox

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican studies · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBaptismAnabaptistsHistoryReligious studiesCitizenshipDamnationTheologyState (computer science)SociologyClassicsLawPhilosophyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Martyrs Mirror: A Social History by David L. Weaver-Zercher Rebecca Barrett-Fox MARTYRS MIRROR: A Social History. By David L. Weaver-Zercher. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2016. Though the demographics of worldwide Anabaptism—a Christian movement that rejects infant baptism and its historic connection to citizenship in a state in favor of adult baptism and the divorcing of church and state—have shifted to South America, Asia, and Africa, their historic roots are in the Netherlands. It was here, in the 1660, that Thieleman J. van Braght published Martyrs Mirror, stories of Christian martyrdom from the time of Jesus. Also known as The Bloody Theater, the books takes nearly 2000 pages to cover the stories of the apostles, early Christians, and those who were coming to identify as Anabaptists in the 1500 and 1600s. Approximately 2500 early Anabaptists embraced martyrdom at the hands of both Catholics and Protestants as part of their nonviolent theology. Martyrs Mirror collected their suffering in a foundational text for future Mennonites, Amish, and Hutterites, including the many worldwide who do not trace their ancestry to the Netherlands. David J. Weaver-Zercher's Martyrs Mirror: A Social History examines how this book informs the lives of the roughly 2.1 million Anabaptists in the world today—a group well-represented in the US and Canada, primarily due to a high birth and retention rate among more conservative believers. Weaver-Zercher's book considers the diverse and contested ways that the book has been used: as a source of gruesome bedtime stories that encourage children to solidify their faith, as a resource that helps forge ethnic unity, as proud evidence of the group's dedication to peacemaking. Weaver-Zercher offers a history of Anabaptist martyrdom and the initial production of the book, but American studies scholars will likely be most interested in what happens when the text comes to America. After taking readers through the American history of the book, Weaver-Zercher explores the ways that "tradition-minded" and "assimilated" Anabaptists—those who live lives in greater and lesser tension with the non-Anabaptist world—use Martyrs Mirror to their own ends. These two chapters usefully illuminate one of the book's earlier points: that Martyrs Mirror, like all religious texts, has always been used to promote the [End Page 110] view of the one laying claim to its power. Because "Martyrs Mirror has functioned, and continues to function, as a measure of Christian faithfulness" (x), those who can make the greatest claim on it are also the ones defining "faithfulness"—likely a cause of the many fractions among Anabaptists. Conservative Anabaptists read it to find justification for strict sectarianism and deference to the community of believers. Among "assimilated" Anabaptists, the distinctive history of the faith may be downplayed, even as the parts of its theology that align with progressive politics—such as individual agency in opposing state-led violence—are forwarded; in these settings, the role of Martyrs Mirror "is both more muted and more complicated" (239). The stories from Martyrs Mirror, particularly the story of Dirk Willems, who was martyred after rescuing a bounty hunter who fell into icy water while pursuing him, are used not just for personal piety but for political projects both within and outside the church. Most compelling is Weaver-Zercher's chapter on what Martyrs Mirror means in a world in which Anabaptists now reside not primarily in the safety of the US and Canada but in places where violence is part of a daily life. In April 2017, Mennonite Michael Sharp, a white American with long family roots in the Mennonite faith, was working with a Swedish colleague and their Congolese guides as part of a UN investigation into human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo when he, along with his companions, was murdered. As shocking as Sharp's death was to Mennonites, they had a working martyrology to make sense of his death, a history in which to insert it. Today, according to the Mennonite Mission Network, more than 5000 Congolese Mennonites—more than twice the number of European Anabaptists killed during the Radical Reformation—remain in hiding for their own...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,564
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican studiesMême sujetReformation and Early Modern ChristianityTravaux en français237 207