MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W28097318 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.9.633

Sudden death of a three-month-old infant while cosleeping on a sofa

2004· article· en· W28097318 sur OpenAlexaff
Aurore Côté

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Établissements canadiensHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDaughterMedicinePediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The death of the three-month-old infant in question occurred during the summer. The parents described the infant, who was born at term, as a quiet, robust and healthy baby with no past medical problems, who cried only if she was unhappy. There was little known about the perinatal history except that the mother smoked during pregnancy and still smokes. The mother has had several miscarriages and, at the time of writing, has a four-year-old daughter in good health. The three-month-old infant, who always slept on her back, usually in her parents' room, was bottle-fed. The death occurred during a heat wave. During the evening before the death, the parents consumed alcohol; the father is said to have drunk three large cans of beer, while the mother had one can. It is unclear at what time the parents went to bed. They fell asleep on the sofa in the living room. At the time, the baby was in her own bed in the parents' room. The mother was awakened by the cries of the baby at around 03:00 and fed her. Because the baby would still not sleep and was crying, the father took her with him to the sofa. The mother went to sleep in the bedroom. To keep the baby from falling, the father put her between his legs. The baby usually woke up at 08:00 and cried for food. It was only around 13:00 that the father awoke to find the baby blue and lifeless. Reanimation was ineffective, even after a prompt transfer to the hospital and attempts at full cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The autopsy performed at the medicolegal institute did not provide a cause for death. The lungs were congestive with pulmonary edema, but there were no alveolar hemorrhages, no evidence of massive thorax compression and no hemorrhagic infiltration of the tissues in the neck or thorax. There was no head trauma. The brain examination revealed none of the classical signs of anoxia or asphyxia. The conclusion of the coroner was accidental death. There are several important elements in this story: an unusual cosleeping arrangement; alcohol consumption by the parents (especially the father) before sleep; some degree of parental tiredness because the parents woke up quite late the next day; and a somewhat ‘vulnerable' infant due to exposure to maternal cigarette smoke in utero. There was also no evidence that the baby was compressed when the father woke up. However, if he was sleeping soundly because of alcohol, the baby could have died of suffocation by compression much earlier on. It is well known that asphyxia by airway obstruction can leave no external traces. The findings at autopsy were nonspecific. These types of findings are seen in babies that die with no cause identified (sudden infant death syndrome [SIDS]) and in babies with evidence of asphyxia (airway obstruction in infants wedged in restricted areas, suffocation by plastic material on the face obstructing the airway, etc) (1). Some coroners and medical examiners are reluctant to assign a diagnosis of SIDS to any death in bedsharing arrangements; moreover, there is debate in the scientific literature regarding the risks of bedsharing, an age-old tradition in many societies. It is, nevertheless, clear that some sleeping arrangements should be avoided because of an increased risk of sudden infant death (2–5). Sofa sharing, for example, is associated with one of the highest risks (OR 31, 95% CI 9 to 111) (2) when victims of sudden death are compared with an age-matched control group. Furthermore, sofa sharing with a cosleeper who has consumed alcohol is an additional risk factor for sudden death. In addition, the baby reported here had been exposed to tobacco smoke during pregnancy (and after). Currently, prone sleeping has been almost eliminated as a risk factor and maternal smoking during pregnancy has become the most important risk factor for sudden infant death (6–8). This infant usually slept on her back in her parents' room. Sleeping on the back and room sharing are protective against SIDS (2,5). As is seen in many cases of sudden infant death, parents usually comply with physician recommendations; it is in unusual circumstances, such as when travelling or when very tired (or having consumed alcohol), that they initiate other types of sleeping arrangements that are unsafe. It is also possible that the infant died of another cause. In this case, the autopsy was performed at a medicolegal institute where the pathologists were not experts in paediatric disease. A study in Quebec (9) showed clearly that when autopsies were performed by a paediatric pathologist a cause of death was found in three times as many infants as when the autopsies were performed by a pathologist with no paediatric expertise. Unfortunately, when an accidental death is suspected, the case is usually referred to a medicolegal institute. Even with this caveat, it is important to widely publicize the risks of unsafe sleeping arrangements. Scientists, physicians, and health and child care professionals are still debating whether the small risk associated with cosleeping with a nonsmoking, breastfeeding mother outweighs the benefit gained from bedsharing. The debate will likely continue for some time. Nonetheless, sofa sharing, bedsharing with persons having altered arousal conditions (eg, consumption of medication, drugs or alcohol), and bedsharing on makeshift beds with cushions and pillows are all situations with a very significant risk for sudden infant death that can be modified with public health education. It is, therefore, critical to alert parents that safe sleeping arrangements are important under all circumstances, especially if they are travelling, very tired or under the influence of substances that decrease arousal. Nobody knows the cause of SIDS, and it appears that some infants are particularly vulnerable. Because we have no means or tests with which to identify these infants, safety precautions for infant sleep must apply to everyone and at all times.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→Travaux en français237 207→