MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2810658556 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2018.0036

Southern Mercy: Empire and American Civilization in Juvenile Reform, 1890–1944 by Annette Louise Bickford

2018· article· en· W2810658556 sur OpenAlex
Tobin Miller Shearer

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmpireWhite (mutation)Context (archaeology)State (computer science)CivilizationPolitical scienceHumanismEconomic JusticeLawSociologyHistoryGender studiesArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Southern Mercy: Empire and American Civilization in Juvenile Reform, 1890–1944 by Annette Louise Bickford Tobin Miller Shearer Southern Mercy: Empire and American Civilization in Juvenile Reform, 1890–1944. By Annette Louise Bickford. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016. xiii + 289 pp. Cloth $56.25, paper $24.71. In Southern Mercy, Annette Louise Bickford makes a compelling case that Progressive-Era juvenile reform institutions in North Carolina fostered and maintained white supremacy under the guise of compassion. Show trials, policy initiatives, budgetary expenditures, and state-sponsored intervention into the lives of poor white and black families demonstrated to the North that the South could act in civilized ways despite a record of lynching and mob violence. Through publicity about the founding of institutions like the State Industrial School at Samarcand for white girls and the Morrison Training School for black boys, white North Carolinians flaunted their generosity and law-abiding ways to a Northern elite suspicious of white Southerners' fitness for the white supremacist project of building empire. Employing robust postmodern theory, Bickford analyzes four juvenile reformatories founded between 1891 and 1923. She shows how proclamations of mercy in the context of Southern modernity shaped liberal humanism through the racial- and gender-inflected policies of the criminal justice system. In addition to the Samarcand and Morrison facilities, the Stonewall Jackson Manual Training and Industrial School for white boys and the State Training School for Negro Girls at Efland provide a context for examining the local-level dynamics of state-sponsored disciplinary practices. For example, Bickford explains how the state's decision to provide a refuge for black boys from the threats of lynch mobs drew public attention to compassionate justice while obscuring [End Page 267] inadequate funding, widespread violence, and abject neglect at the hands of those tasked with saving children of African descent. A record of abuse fronted by a veneer of propriety served the political interests of the white reformers. Replete with ethnographic and historical detail, the anecdotes at the heart of Southern Mercy fill the narrative with pathos and tragedy. Despite a public show of mercy, twelve of the sixteen girls who set fire to buildings in which they had experienced prolonged mistreatment and injurious harm ultimately spent their teen years incarcerated. One Morrison Training School ward died at the hands of fellow residents after they beat him for attempting to run away. An adult supervisor watched the beating and staged a drowning accident to cover up the murder. Many residents of the Samarcand institution received involuntary hysterectomies during their stay, a procedure inspired by eugenics and part of a larger initiative to control the residents' minds and bodies. But the author is far more interested in applying the theories of Michel Foucault than in evoking pity through poignant stories. The text is chockablock with Foucauldian quotations, theories, and references. While many of these insights serve her argument well, the sheer plentitude of textual references to the French postmodernist at times proves distracting. A more judicious sprinkling of his theory would have made for a more balanced and well-seasoned text. Bickford is at her best when parsing the contradictory impulses of the white and black reformers engaged in juvenile reform. For example, the efforts of African American progressive Charlotte Hawkins Brown to found and sustain a reform facility for black girls appear both heroic and conflicted. On the one hand, Brown pushed back hard against the assumption that black girls were invisible and unworthy of state support. On the other, she colluded with white bourgeois reformers' conviction that black women and girls were promiscuous and ultimately unfit for motherhood. In the process, the goal of reformulating "Southern womanhood" to include black and white representations of femininity remained elusive (119). The ultimate goal of Southern Mercy is to critique contemporary criminal justice practices. As the author declares at the onset, her book is "directed more at the present than the past" (23). She concludes by excoriating modern criminal justice practices, calling for radical rather than gradualist action, and enjoining her readers to "think about the past in different ways" as a first step toward contemporary reform (200). In this trenchant critique of the contemporary criminal...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,732
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,196
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle