Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cautionary Notes on Sustainability Principles Sally L. Kitch (bio) The large auditorium was packed when Vandana Shiva visited Arizona State University (ASU) in the fall of 2014 as the public guest speaker for the HfE North American Observatory's third workshop, Transdisciplinary Imagination(s) for the Anthropocene: Dinner 2040. Shiva is among many activists and theorists who have reached broad general consensus that global society should strive for a high quality of life that is equitably shared and sustainable for all species (Adamson 2016, 136). She is also part of a wider movement among international actors toward new forms of grassroots political organizing and intergenerational justice (Di Chiro 1992, 2013). Shiva is particularly well known for her efforts to preserve seeds, promote traditional foods, and oppose the dominant pesticide- and proprietary-seed-based model of agribusiness, as well as many other food-system issues. She is perhaps best known (and most vilified) for her opposition to genetically modified foods (GMOs). Her arguments on these issues, which she iterated in her lecture, are compelling. They reflect the disastrous history of corporate and government manipulations of the world's food supply, which has left us with an unsustainable and nutrient-poor food system. Factory farming kills vital species on which humans depend. Government subsidies for major crops have reduced biodiversity in plant species and displaced many nutritious whole grains, such as millet, with refined carbohydrates, such as white wheat flour and polished rice. In addition, those subsidies have glutted the world's diet with corn syrup. Fertilizers and chemicals promoted by [End Page 85] major chemical companies have depleted the soil and poisoned the water supply. The answer to feeding a hungry world, Shiva insists, is support for local, small-scale agriculture, which provides needed jobs; community seed banks; a renewed sense of the commons for water and seed (without patents); collective action by small farmers, including indigenous women; and the decline of corporate ownership and control of the world's food supply. (Shiva notes that US corporations have the rights of people, without any accompanying responsibilities.) Shiva's talk complemented the North American Observatory's commitment to the integration of environmental sustainability and social justice. Her talk also supported many of the principles that Paul Hirt and I distilled and adapted from a variety of international documents and expert consultants to create a list of environmental sustainability and social justice principles and values, as part of the Archive of Hope and Cautionary Tales. As we composed the list, our expert consultants included steering committee member Julie Sze, visiting expert Giovanna Di Chiro, and HfE co–principal investigator Joni Adamson, as well as sustainability scientists and social scientists associated with ASU's Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute for Sustainability. Our document sources included existing international agreements and guidelines, such as The Principles of Environmental Justice, drawn up in 1991 by community leaders from the United States, Canada, Central and South America, and the Marshall Islands, at the First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit in Washington, DC (Alston 2010; Ciment 2015, 635–36). We also drew from the 1987 Brundtland Report, Our Common Future, which redefined sustainable development in terms of meeting current needs without sacrificing the needs of future generations (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987), and from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit's Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 (Commission on Sustainable Development 1992). Additional sources included the "Rights of Mother Earth" (2010), which urged the "recovery, revalidation, and strengthening of indigenous cosmovisions based on ancient and ancestral indigenous knowledge," as well as "The Future We Want," drafted at the 2012 Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development and signed by all UN member states (UN General Assembly 2012). [End Page 86] In addition to these important international documents and experts, we extracted principles evident in the narratives included in the HfE's Archive of Hope and Cautionary Tales. The stories in the archive represent community debate and action in the US and elsewhere in the world for combining the goals of environmental sustainability and social justice. For the sake of simplicity, we created four main imperatives to represent our synthesis...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».