Improving the Development of Composite Educational Guidelines Using Decomposition of Concept Lattices
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective. To provide a method to improve the development and maintainability costs of composite Educational Guidelines (EG) by decomposing decision tables represented as concept lattices. Background. The development of complex didactic content of EG has been shown to require a specific formalism as compared to the one of traditional guidelines. The personalization of EGs’ content according to complex combinations of clinical conditions can lead to an explosion of EGs, thus increasing development and maintenance costs. Some knowledge-based EG tailoring techniques have previously been published, but require a complete “integrated” revision of the guidelines’ content by experts, thus precluding the automated “on the fly” use of guidelines produced from heterogeneous sources. With the increasing interoperability of clinical information system and the upsurge of personal e-health portals, it is expected that opportunities for exchange and reuse of EG will be more common. Automated formal methods could reduce the cost of development and maintenance of sharable EGs. Methods. The detailed methods of combining EGs for the MI HEART trial have been described elsewhere. Three sets of EGs were merged and specialized to target different population of patients in order to provide individualized content. In the course of the specialization, the narrative content of EGs from heterogeneous sources were parsed in Atomic EGs (AEG). Each AEG were ascribed to its relevant Combination of Clinical Conditions (CCC). AEGs then organized in Decision Tables (DT) and organized in groups sharing the same CCC, clarified and disambiguated. In order to decrease the effort required to transform each set of AEG to a coherent narrative (which requires a manual revision), the DTs were decomposed in unions of smaller DTs using formal concept analysis of concept lattices. Results. In the course of the preparation of the EG for the MI HEART Study, we observed that the DT containing the AEG presented some recurrent characteristics. We then explored formal techniques that could automate the perceived decomposition of the DT into smaller sets of DT. The original DT contained 80 different sets of guidelines combined around six clinical conditions and two cognitive conditions (level of their education). The two resulting sets of guidelines had respectively, 18 and 8 EG. The decomposition was realized around two groups of guidelines for which the mathematical decomposition coincided with some clinical relevance: one of the resulting DT contains the tailored education material for symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction, while the other resulting DT contains the tailored education relative to the actions to be taken in presence of such warning symptoms. Discussion. The decomposition of DT in smaller ones lead to a significant reduction of the total number of guidelines sets and consequently the development efforts. While the heterogeneous EGs used for the MI HEART Trial intuitively suggested such decomposition, the mathematical analysis provides a formal framework to proceed for more complex sets EGs. For the DTs that may have multiple potential decompositions, we propose that the ones with clinical relevance should first be explored. Grant Support. National Library of Medicine and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: N01LM-3534 and a Post Graduate Fellowship from the Medical Research Council of Canada. References
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,036 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».