Re: Preferential Aggregation of Obsessive—Compulsive Spectrum Disorders in Schizophrenia Patients with OCD
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor: Dr Michael Poyurovsky and coauthors1 reported on an interesting study in which they assessed the rates of psychiatric disorders in schizophrenia patients with and without obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) and pure OCD patients. Body dysmorphic disorder, tic disorders (TD), and anxiety disorders were found in higher frequencies in the schizo-obsessive group when compared to pure schizophrenia. The findings support the notion that the schizo-obssesive group may be an intermediate phenotype between schizophrenia and OCD. We would like to comment on the specific findings of TD. Curiously, the authors found no cases of Tourette syndrome in the schizo-obsessive group, while the odds of having chronic motor tics in the schizo-obsessive group (16%) were 4 times higher than those of the schizophrenia group (4%). In the OCD group, the frequency of TD was the classical 34.3% found in the literature.2 The intermediate frequency of TD in the schizo-obsessive group speaks for a continuum between these disorders. One explanation for these higher frequencies of obsessive spectrum disorders could be the presence of common vulnerability genes. There are few reports of Tourette patients who later developed schizophrenia and also few reports of TD in schizophrenia.3-5 The low frequency of TD in schizophrenia could be owing to a real low incidence of tic disorders in schizophrenia, the use of antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients that would mask tics when present, and tics that may be misdiagnosed as Stereotypie behaviors, tardive diskinesia, and other extrapiramidal symptoms that might also lead to an underestimation of TD frequencies.6 To rule out these factors, the authors could have informed medication use in the 3 groups of patients as well as the diagnostic criteria used to differentiate between several involuntary movement disorders. The age of onset of the disorder, used as a covariable, showed no difference between OCD and schizo-obsessive patients. This is another important factor that reinforces the hypothesis that schizo-obsessive, have a place between schizophrenia and OCD, sharing specific comorbidity patterns with both. References 1. Poyurovsky M, Fuchs C, Faragian S, et al. Preferential aggregation of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders in schizophrenia patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51(12):746-754 2. Miguel EC, Leckman JF, Rauch S, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder phenotypes: implications for genetic studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10(3):258-275. 3. Muller N, Riedel M, Zawta W, et al. Comorbidity of Tourette's syndrome and schizophrenia-biological and psysiological parallels. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26(7-8):1245-1252. 4. Wagle AC, Staley CJ. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome with schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case report. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999;11(4):517. 5. Fennig S, Fennig S, Pomeroy J, et al. Developmental disorder, Tourette disorder and schizophrenia: a case study. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sei. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».