MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W286917603 · doi:10.1177/003172170808900508

Focus on Global Education: <i>A Report from the 2007 PDK Summit</i>

2008· article· en· W286917603 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Young

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhi Delta Kappan · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSummitNewspaperGermanMedia studiesSociologyPanel discussionPolitical scienceHistoryGeographyAdvertising

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

THERESA Tarlos, a professor of geography at Orange Coast College in Southern California, teaches her students a foreign language at the same time she teaches them geography. Tarlos, who was educated in Europe and the U.S., is fluent in five languages. Every time she presents a new term to her students, she incorporates the German word for She also assigns panels of eight to 10 students to research how geography is taught in other countries, such as Argentina, France, and Thailand. And every two years, she takes a group of American students abroad for summer school in Europe to cities such as Rome, Florence, and Paris. This is my contribution to global education, Tarlos said. Nancy Kaplan, an English teacher at International School in Staten Island, New York, works with her students to publish an international newspaper that is written by students around the world. Any time meet anybody from another country, that's how build my international reporter base, Kaplan said. just have to keep the connections going. You put it in the hands of the students. They know how to connect with technology, and think the teacher's job is just to help them focus that connection and continue it. These were just two examples of global education that were shared during the panel discussion that kicked off the 2007 PDK Summit on Global Education in Vancouver, British Columbia, on October 18. This wasn't about a panel and an audience, said panelist Vivien Stewart, the Asia Society's vice president of education. This was about a group. The people in the audience have as many good ideas as the people on the panel. Lloyd Axworthy, president of the University of Winnipeg and past director of the Liu Center for the Study of Global Issues at the University of British Columbia, agreed. Axworthy moderated the discussion among five global education experts and accepted questions and comments from the audience. There's an opportunity for your organization to actually do a real inventory of best practices, Axworthy told the Kappans in the audience. Just the sheer sharing of it could add an enormous amount of real fiber to what could be done. What I'm hearing, very briefly, is that there are a lot of pretty interesting, exciting things going on, not only what our panel is proposing, but also what you yourself are involved in. Stewart agreed, noting that the conversation about global education has evolved. I think the question has changed from whether we should teach about the world to how to teach about the world, given everything else that we have to do, she said. Panelist Karen Kodama, an international education administrator at the Seattle Public Schools, was until recently the principal of John Stanford International School, a K-5 bilingual immersion public school in Seattle. She found room for global issues in the curriculum by superimposing a global perspective on other subjects. There's not enough time in the day to teach everything you think you need to teach, Kodama said. really need to prioritize to see how you can begin to integrate. wanted to teach a world language. don't have enough time in the day to add another subject, so why can't you just overlay it on top of subjects? At John Stanford, that's exactly what they did. Students began to spend half their day studying math, science, culture, and literacy in their chosen world language, either Japanese or Spanish. Parents and community leaders liked the approach and asked why international education wasn't available in other parts of the city and to students from kindergarten to 12th grade. Now, Kodama is looking at ways for the district to expand its international education program to make those things happen. We wouldn't have to call it international education if we had this type of education for all our children, because aren't we all just preparing our children to be successful, not only in college and work but for the world? …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,142
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,282

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,002
Communication savante0,0110,006
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,348
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhi Delta KappanMême sujetGlobal Education and MulticulturalismTravaux en français237 207