MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2883107923

N-Representability in the Quantum Kernel Energy Method

2018· article· en· W2883107923 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Walter Polkosnik

Notice bibliographique

RevueCUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of Naval ResearchMount Saint Vincent University
Mots-clésKernel (algebra)QuantumEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsDiscrete mathematics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Kernel Energy Method (KEM) delivers accurate full molecule energies using less computational resources than standard ab-initio quantum chemical approaches. KEM achieves this efficiency by decomposing a system of atoms into disjoint subsets called kernels. The results of full ab-initio calculations on each individual single kernel and on each double kernel formed by the union of each pair of single kernels are combined in an equation of a form that is specific to KEM to provide an approximation to the full molecule energy. KEM has been demonstrated to give accurate molecular energies over a wide range of systems, chemical methods and basis sets. The efficiency of KEM makes calculations on large systems tractable. It has been shown to be accurate for calculations on large biomolecules including proteins and DNA. KEM has recently been generalized to provide the one-body density matrix for the full molecule. This generalization greatly expands the utility of the method since the density matrix enables simple calculation of the expectation value of any observable associated with a one-body operator. More importantly, the generalization enables results from KEM to be constrained to satisfy essential quantum mechanical conditions. KEM is generalized to density matrices by taking the density matrices obtained from the single and double kernels and adapting them to the full molecule basis. These augmented kernel density matrices are summed according to the standard KEM expansion. This initial matrix does not necessarily correspond to a valid quantum mechanical N-electron wavefunction which is normalized and obeys the Pauli principle. Such a density matrix is called N-representable. N-representability is imposed on the initial matrix by using the Clinton equations, which deliver a single-determinant N-representable one-body density matrix. Single-determinant N-representability is ensured by enforcing the density matrix to be a normalized projector. Such normalized projectors are factorizable into matrices which deliver full molecule molecular orbitals. Although energies have been demonstrated to be accurate in the original energy expansion form of KEM, there is no requirement that the energy corresponds to the expectation value of a valid quantum mechanical wavefunction. Because of this, there is no requirement that the energies satisfy the variational theorem. Imposing single-determinant N-representability on the KEM density matrix by using the Clinton equations recovers the variational bound on the energy obtained from KEM. Recovery of the variational bound by the N-representable KEM density matrix has been demonstrated by calculations on several water clusters. Energies from full molecule restricted Hartree-Fock calculations were compared to energies obtained from the KEM energy expansion and to energies obtained from the KEM density matrix expansion which had N-representability imposed. In each case where the energy expansion gave energies that violated the variational bound the N-representable density matrix gave energies that satisfied the bound and in fact were more accurate than the simple energy expansion results. The effect of imposing N-representability on the KEM density matrix has also been investigated in the context of Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory (KS/DFT). Calculations on a simple noble gas system and a single water cluster were done. KS/DFT energies were compared to energies from the KEM energy expansion and energies associated with the KEM density matrix expansion on which N-representability was imposed. The energies from the KEM density matrix expansion made N-representable were more accurate than those obtained from straightforward KEM energy expansions in nearly all cases for the noble gas system. For the water cluster the accuracy of the energy obtained from the N-representable KEM density matrix was nearly four times closer to the energy calculated for the full system than the KEM energy expansion result. The Clinton-purified N-representable matrix obtained from the KEM density expansion can be used to calculate expectation values for any one-electron operator. In particular, a KEM density matrix approach can be used in the study of quantum crystallography.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,412
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)Même sujetAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsTravaux en français237 207