Introduction of Competence by Design to Canadian Nephrology Postgraduate Training
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, with its Competence by Design initiative, is adopting the principles of competency-based medical education for residency training and continuing professional development. This initiative is being undertaken to meet the new standards of medical education in Canada, which include social accountability to meet performance-based outcomes of training. Nephrology is poised to implement Competence by Design into residency training in July 2018 and initiate a continuous quality improvement cycle to periodically renew and update the training requirements to be socially accountable and relevant in the modern age of medicine. The purpose of this review is to describe the process of entrustable professional activity and required training experience development and how they will affect subspecialty training in Canada. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The construct of competency-based medical education was derived from existing literature searches of the medical education literature, including documentation provided by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The content for each entrustable professional activity and milestone was derived by consensus from the community expertise of the working group, existing speciality training requirements, and elements of training requirements that the Royal College has been mandated to superimpose on all training requirements to meet societal expectations. METHODS: The Royal College Specialty Committee in Nephrology participated in 2 years of preparation for this implementation, which has included the creation of a new educational design for the discipline and the elucidation of entrustable professional activities to describe the scope of nephrology practice and to guide teaching, learning, and assessment in residency, and ultimately maintenance of competence in practice. KEY FINDINGS: This article introduces the set of entrustable professional activities for adult and pediatric nephrology and describes the national consultation as part of an ongoing quality improvement of this work. LIMITATIONS: The implementation of Competence by Design will be tested by whether trainees embrace competency-based education by training to just entrustable professional activities, rather than the holistic model idealized in physician training. This is mitigated by the entrustable professional activity development incorporating multiple layers of competencies beyond a procedural skill. Time commitment for faculty will pose additional challenges in increasing the time for assessment of trainees, but is supported by electronic platforms at the Royal College to assist in data gathering and analysis. IMPLICATIONS: Competence by Design in nephrology is an outcomes-based curriculum and assessment platform that aims to train nephrologists to meet societal expectations in an ever-changing and complicated health care system. The goals are to increase safety and professional accountability to society and improve upon the already high standards of training within Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,043 | 0,106 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».