Foundations of Library and Information Science. 2nd ed
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Why would a practicing medical librarian want to read a new edition of a text used in a required foundations class for graduate students in library and information science (LIS)? First, it has been many years since most of us were in library school. We know that our profession has changed and we all keep up as much as we can, but each of us knows some aspects of the profession better than others. Librarianship was once a profession in which change could come slowly; that is no longer possible. A current, systematic text can help us fill in some gaps in our understanding and make the intellectual connections with what we already know. Second, we all have to explain these principles to nonlibrarians from time to time. Here in one volume, we have a helpful resource that explains the rationale for them. Third, we can use it in our professional recruitment and mentoring activities. Few of us will want to read it straight through, but most will find useful sections. In short, like many medical textbooks, it is a valuable reference. Librarians, faculty, students, and employers have a wide range of expectations of what an LIS master's degree graduate should know. This text does not cover the entire curriculum, but such a foundations course usually is a prerequisite for the rest of the curriculum. It emphasizes common issues for many kinds of librarianship with brief discussions of implications for some specializations. The author is the director of the School of Library and Information Science at Kent State University in Ohio [1]. Other books by the same author from the same publisher include Hiring Library Employees: A How-to-do-it Manual and Human Resource Management in Libraries: Theory and Practice. Rubin's textbook is comprehensive and supplements topics with excellent suggestions for further reading. The writing is information dense and never rambles. The chapters cover libraries in the context of the current information infrastructure, a service perspective on information science, and the impacts and implications of technological change on libraries. Information policy is covered from a macro level (the information industry, government control) through selection, collection, reference, and access policies to a micro level with an individual client. Other chapters cover the organization of information and the organization of the institution. The book has excellent descriptions of the history and current development of the institutions, professional education, and the profession. As any good foundations text should, it includes an extensive discussion of ethics and standards. The appendixes cover major periodicals, indexes, dictionaries, and encyclopedias in the field; professional associations (including the Medical Library Association); American Library Association–accredited master's degree programs in the United States and Canada; and codes of ethics from nonlibrary information professions. (The library and information science association codes of ethics are in the main text.) The use of annual numeric data as recent as 2003 (with projections as far off as 2010) is an indicator of the currency of this edition. Topics not in the first edition from 1998 [2] include the semantic Web; Internet2; the USA Patriot Act; the Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act; MARC21; the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative; digital rights management; digital libraries; the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC); electronic reference; and the Kellogg– Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) Information Professions Education Reform (KALIPER) project. The only other current related textbook, Fundamentals of Information Studies: Understanding Information and Its Environment [3], is intended for undergraduate use and has much less emphasis on libraries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Étiquettes directes de modèles (non validées)
Étiquettes de catégorie et de devis d'étude par modèle, issues des rondes d'étiquetage. C'est une sortie machine, non validée, et le désaccord entre modèles est livré comme donnée. Aucun devis ici n'est encore validé contre MEDLINE.
| Bras | Catégories | Devis d'étude | Confiance |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | aucune catégorie Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Autre Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non | Sans objet | low |
| gpt | aucune catégorie Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Autre Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non | Sans objet | high |
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,026 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle