MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2885959302 · doi:10.52567/trj.v1i02.39

NEED FOR IMMEDIATE SWALLOWING SCREENING IN POST STROKE PATIENTS

2017· article· en· W2885959302 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faiza Badar

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Rehabilitation Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDysphagia Assessment and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDysphagiaMedicineSwallowingStroke (engine)Aspiration pneumoniaPneumoniaPopulationIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyHealth careEmergency medicinePediatricsSurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Stroke is the leading cause of severe neurological disability in adults and is allied with an array of complications. Dysphagia complicates acute ischemic strokes (AIS) in 42% cases and is more evident during the first week after ischemic stroke. Chest infection complicates AIS in 32% of the cases and 89% of these cases are due to dysphagia1 Pneumonia in stroke patients is often associated with aspiration. Swallowing assessment at time of admission in stroke patients can help in minimizing risk of pneumonia in stroke patients. A common perception is that Islamabad being the federal capital should be the model which should be replicated, however, despite its small size in both territorial and population terms although being endowed with adequate financial resources the provision of health services in the suburbs is not satisfactory. This situation is not unique to Islamabad; same situation is prevalent in all cities of Pakistan and other developing countries. Visits and interviews conducted in ICT indicated that currently no government or private hospital have any protocol for swallowing assessment at time of admission for stroke patients. There is ample evidence that best practice in the care of patients with stroke is the early screening and identification of dysphagia as it allows for timely intervention resulting in reduced morbidity, length of stay, and health care expenditures. To ensure early detection of dysphagia, and to prevent dysphagia-related complications, screening of all stroke patients at time of admission for signs of swallowing issues is advisable. When a swallowing screening protocol is implemented, there is a decrease in morbidity over each year that the protocol is in place2. Implementation of strict swallowing screening protocol for patients with stroke, can improve clinicians’ adherence with screening swallowing before starting oral feed. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) included screening of swallowing before starting oral feed , liquid, or medication in individuals presenting with stroke symptoms as part of their guidelines on the early management of adults with acute stroke. Completion of dysphagia screening prior to administration of oral intake was a Joint Commission (JC) required performance measure for Primary Stroke Center Certification until year 20103. Many acute care facilities in developed countries have protocols according to which screening for dysphagia will be completed and documented on all ischemic /hemorrhagic stroke patients including warning strokes before food, fluids, or medication are started. Screening methods may include, but are not limited to, (a) water swallow tests, such as the Burke water swallow test or the 3 oz. Water swallow test (Suiter & Leder, 2008); (b) swallowing screening protocols including brief assessments of oral motor and sensory function as well as water swallow tests, such as the Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test or the Simple Standardized Bedside Swallowing Assessment; or (c) clinical (bedside) Swallow examinations.4 Developing countries are still busy fighting communicable diseases and are unable to pay much attention to non communicable diseases such as stroke, although the number of stroke patients added to population increase the already existing BOD for these nations many fold. A study was conducted in India with aim to develop a bedside assessment protocol and grading scale for oro pharyngeal dysphagia. The Nair hospital bedside swallowing assessment (NHBSA) and Nair hospital swallowing ability scale (NHSAS) were developed after reviewing related literature. The NHBSA and NHSAS show high reliability and high face and content validity. Comparison with modified barium swallow revealed that the NHBSA appears to show potential in precisely identifying dysphagia and aspiration. 'Wet-gurgly voice quality,' 'cough after/during swallow ‘and’ weak/absent volitional cough' was the clinical indicators that appeared to properly discover presence of aspiration risk. Guidelines and Pathways (protocols) are necessary to ensure quality care in health care facilities. The skills and competencies outlined in practice standard guide and protocols are important components in the provision of standardized quality health care. Patients tends to receive the greatest benefit when a number of health-care professionals team up, each bringing his/her own particular expertise to assessment and treatment of dysphagia. According to practice standards and guidelines for dysphagia intervention by speech- language pathologists given by College Of Audiologists And Speech Language Pathologists Of Ontario “Any regulated health professional trained in the clinical assessment of patients/clients (e.g. nurses, physicians, dietitians, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists) may conduct swallowing screening. Speech pathologists, however, can play a fundamental role in making dysphagia screening programs and educating those who conduct screening regarding the appropriate interpretation of findings.6 Keeping in view current health care services in our country, planning to have speech pathologist available at all emergency departments for swallowing screen appears to be almost impossible; we will need to train our allied health staff for initial dysphagia screening in emergency departments . All hospitals of Islamabad having emergency departments and catering stroke patients should make an effort to include dysphagia screening in their stroke care protocols at time of admission

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,412
Écart entre enseignants0,374 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Rehabilitation JournalMême sujetDysphagia Assessment and ManagementTravaux en français237 207