Abstract 5673: Complex, patient-derived, multi-cell type, 3D models of breast cancer for personalized prediction of therapeutic response
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Breast cancer survival has drastically improved over the past decades; however, drug resistance and subsequent disease progression is responsible for the incurability of advanced disease. While the focus of many drug response studies is the transformed tumor cells, there is increasing evidence suggesting a role for stromal cells in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Microenvironmental components, including extracellular matrix, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and adipocytes, all contribute to physiological mammary gland biogenesis. Accordingly, these stromal elements contribute to disease progression and resistance. However, many in vitro drug response studies still utilize 2D monolayer cultures with purified breast tumor cells. In vivo studies remain the gold standard for drug development, even though they are performed with immune-compromised mice that may not reflect the physiological tumor microenvironment and have been repeatedly shown to be a poor representation of clinical outcomes. Thus, there is a need for more complex in vitro models to test drug response effectively and accurately. We have previously demonstrated the benefits of using a patient-derived, tri-culture (3x), 3D perfusion microtumor (3DpMT) system. To further replicate the complex tumor microenvironment, we have expanded to a penta-culture (5x) model by incorporating macrophages and lymphocytes alongside the tumor cells, fibroblasts, and adipocytes of the 3x model. We have accrued over 207 primary tumor samples, including both resected tumor and core biopsies, from which we have generated 12 stable PDX models (~50% ER+) and >20 3x, 4x, and 5x 3DpMT with a focus on triple negative (TNBC). The 5x patient-derived 3DpMT tissues represent our most complex breast cancer in vitro model and have been cultured successfully for up to 5 weeks allowing for high-throughput, long term drug response testing with different dosing strategies. They have been characterized by flow cytometry, IHC, RNA expression, NGS, DNA methylation patterns, and cytokine/chemokine secretion. When possible, marker expression has been compared to the primary tumor. Furthermore, the accuracy of our models to replicate clinical tissue is evident in the similar toxicities of chemotherapies observed in clinical use. With these models we can replicate physiological processes including cell migration, polarization of macrophages, activation of lymphocytes, and changes in molecular profiles throughout the duration of our 5x culture assays. Our model has the potential to test a myriad of drugs, from conventional chemotherapies to novel immunotherapies over extended time periods with different dosing strategies in order to provide a more accurate prediction of patient-specific clinical response. Citation Format: Qi Guo, Melissa Millard, Christine Wilhelm, Ashley Elrod, Nick Erdman, Lacey E. Dobrolecki, Brian McKinley, Mary Rippon, Wendy Cornett, John Rinkliff, Amanda Scopteuolo, Linda Gray, James Epling, Barbara Garner, Jeff Hanna, Eric McGill, C. David Williams, David Schammel, David L. Kaplan, Christopher Corless, Jeff Edenfield, Michael T. Lewis, Howland E. Crosswell, Teresa M. DesRochers. Complex, patient-derived, multi-cell type, 3D models of breast cancer for personalized prediction of therapeutic response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5673.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».