Abstract B12: Differences in neoplastic transformation potential between OSE and FTE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: The most common and aggressive histotype of ovarian cancer is high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which accounts for approximately 90% of deaths. Furthermore, the risk of developing HGSC is increased by having a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene. There is considerable evidence detailing the fallopian tube epithelia (FTE) as the site of origin of the disease, yet the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) is still proposed as the site of origin by some. Currently, no studies have compared in vivo/xenografts models derived from FTE and OSE of BRCA mutation carriers. We suggest that in vivo/xenograft models can prove a useful tool for understanding the disease origins, meanwhile accounting for the genetic characteristics of the disease. Methodology: Immortalized and transformed cell lines, from both FTE and OSE, were derived from both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. In particular, 16 OSE cell lines were created--3 from BRCA1 carriers and noncarriers. Cell lines were transfected with hTERT and SV40, and either vectors overexpressing cMYC and hRASV12. 8 of these lines with cMYC or hRASV12 were injected into the mammary fat pad of 6-week-old female NSG mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid). Similarly, 16 FTE lines were generated from 2-BRCA1 and 1 BRCA2 heterozygous mutation and 3 non-BRCA carriers overexpressing hTERT and SV40 with either cMYC or hRASV12. Results: To date, tumors have developed from mice injected with ovarian surface epithelial cells and fallopian tube epithelial cells at the mammary fat pad and the intraperitoneal cavity. FTE cells injected intraperitoneally produced ascites and displayed tumors lining the abdominal cavity and major organs. The parental immortal lines of 4 cases were karyotyped: FTE-37 and FTE-19 (controls); FTE-13 (BRCA2 mutant) and FTE-98 (BRCA1 mutant) cell lines demonstrated varying types of tetraploidy while the control (BRCA wild type) had fewer tetraploid chromosomes. Western blot analyses demonstrated that tumors express PAX8 and epithelial markers associated with HGSC. STR profiling using GenePrint 10 also revealed that injected FTE cells grown in vitro clustered with xenograft tumors of the same cell line, demonstrating that cell line and tumors retained the same characteristics during tumor development. It is hypothesized that SV40 alone is sufficient to stimulate genomic instability in the FTE cells. Several cell lines grown in culture with expression of hRASV12 demonstrated increased proliferation relative to normal control cells. Conclusions: Our results suggest that tumor development occurs at different rates in vivo and is dependent on multiple factors including genetic mutation, expression of oncogenes, and patient-derived characteristics. We demonstrated that cells grown in culture exhibit unstable chromosomal architecture characteristic of ovarian carcinomas, which is one of many potential factors that promotes neoplastic change in the tissue. Understanding how these factors act in promoting tumorigenesis will enable us to understand the molecular changes that occur in vivo prior to the development of ovarian serous carcinoma. Citation Format: Ramlogan Sowamber, Mauricio Medrano, Noor Salman, Zahra Maamir, Nick Chauvin, Mahmoud Bitar, Patricia Shaw, Sophia HL George. Differences in neoplastic transformation potential between OSE and FTE. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference: Addressing Critical Questions in Ovarian Cancer Research and Treatment; Oct 1-4, 2017; Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(15_Suppl):Abstract nr B12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».