MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2886269190 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.2018.4588

A SHALLOW-BURIAL MINERALIZATION MODEL FOR THE UNCONFORMITY-RELATED URANIUM DEPOSITS IN THE ATHABASCA BASIN

2018· article· en· W2886269190 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEconomic Geology · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensGeological Survey of CanadaGovernment of SaskatchewaniNano Medical (Canada)University of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesFuzhou UniversityUniversity of Regina
Mots-clésUnconformityGeological surveyChinaGeologyLibrary scienceStructural basinArchaeologyMining engineeringGeographyPaleontologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| August 01, 2018 A SHALLOW-BURIAL MINERALIZATION MODEL FOR THE UNCONFORMITY-RELATED URANIUM DEPOSITS IN THE ATHABASCA BASIN G. Chi; G. Chi 1 Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada † Corresponding author: e-mail: guoxiang.chi@uregina.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Z. Li; Z. Li 1 Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar H. Chu; H. Chu 1 Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada2 China University of Geosciences, Beijing 10083, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar K. M. Bethune; K. M. Bethune 1 Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar D. H. Quirt; D. H. Quirt 3 Orano Canada Inc., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 3X5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar P. Ledru; P. Ledru 3 Orano Canada Inc., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 3X5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar C. Normand; C. Normand 4 Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 2C8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar C. Card; C. Card 4 Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 2C8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar S. Bosman; S. Bosman 4 Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 2C8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar W. J. Davis; W. J. Davis 5 Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar E. G. Potter E. G. Potter 5 Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Economic Geology (2018) 113 (5): 1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.2018.4588 Article history accepted: 12 May 2018 first online: 31 Jul 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation G. Chi, Z. Li, H. Chu, K. M. Bethune, D. H. Quirt, P. Ledru, C. Normand, C. Card, S. Bosman, W. J. Davis, E. G. Potter; A SHALLOW-BURIAL MINERALIZATION MODEL FOR THE UNCONFORMITY-RELATED URANIUM DEPOSITS IN THE ATHABASCA BASIN. Economic Geology 2018;; 113 (5): 1209–1217. doi: https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.2018.4588 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyEconomic Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The unconformity-related U deposits associated with the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin are among the largest and richest U deposits in the world. The conventional genetic model suggests that mineralization occurred under deep-burial (>5 km), diagenetic-hydrothermal conditions at normal geothermal gradients (~35°C/km). Based on regional geochronostratigraphic and ore geochronological data, it is inferred that, at the time of primary U mineralization (≥ ca. 1540 Ma), the burial depths of the unconformity surface were likely <~3 km. The elevated fluid pressures (up to 1,500 bars) used to support the deep-burial model were probably overestimated due to misinterpretation of accidentally entrapped halite crystals as daughter minerals in fluid inclusions. The elevated fluid temperatures (180°–250°C) estimated from fluid inclusion and clay mineral geothermometry from both mineralized and barren areas, which were interpreted to have resulted from deep burial at normal geothermal gradients at the time of mineralization, may be alternatively explained by local or basin-scale elevation of geothermal gradients at the time of mineralization, followed by continued burial and/or temporarily increased thermal gradients after mineralization. The shallow-burial mineralization model can better explain the geologic characteristics of the unconformity-related U deposits, including development of pervasive clay alteration halos, breccia zones, and dissolution vugs locally filled with drusy quartz, as well as evidence of fluid boiling recorded by fluid inclusions. The modified model emphasizes the importance of combined basinal (development of brines) and deep-seated geodynamic factors for large-scale U mineralization. Recognition of these factors is important for U exploration in the Athabasca Basin and similar basins elsewhere. You do not currently have access to this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,647
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle