Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How can one explain that a thing or a person is there and not elsewhere? Through History, this problem hasaroused many debates in geography. Recently, Augustin Berque has renewed this questioning, relying in parton Plato's Timaeus. Posing, like Plato, that everything on Earth is a body occupying a place, he has pointedout the difference between the chora and the topos. In his opinion, the chora is, at once, the state of the bodiesthat a place has generated, the set that the connection of these bodies constitutes, and the vector of theirbecoming, while the topos is only a geometrical element, a point or a figure that geodesic measurements aresufficient to establish. Even though the concept of chora is useful for understanding the natural determinantsof geographical conditions, it does not explain what in geography is fundamentally human. To remedy this,we sketch a theory of place taking into account the political foundation of humanity, a pillar on which manyhuman specificities are built, especially Law and Justice. It means considering the polis as an institution, initself different from the natural determinants of human settlements. This institution, which is responsible forthe identity and freedom of human beings, is the first condition of all forms of human self-determination.Without it, the possibility of succeeding in being human does not exist. Nor does the possibility of failing tobe human. Because the polis, though potentially liberating, is also generating its own determination. Thus,its potentialities are matched only by the constraints it generates. In short, human self-determination is notindeterminacy. This is why we envisage a theory of place focusing on the political determination of thehuman being in order to recognize the modulation of the potentialities and the constraints that structure it. Inour view, this modulation is related to the topological codetermination of the movements of social actorswhich defines, at the scale of the region, a geographical structure in equilibrium or in transition. In otherwords, each region as a structure specifically configured by the orientation and the regulation of themovements of social actors. With regard to the orientation, these movements are of four types: entry, exit,non-entry, non-exit. In terms of regulation, they are divided into two categories: either the movement isexoregulated, when the codetermination induces a constraint to movement; either it is endoregulated, whenthe codetermination facilitates it. It results from the crossing of the categories of orientation and those of theregulation eight types of movements: gathering (endoregulated entry), escape (endoregulated exit), avoidance(endoregulated non-entry), station (endoregulated non-exit), concentration (exoregulated entry), expulsion(exoregulated exit), repelling (exoregulated non-entry), and confinement (non-exoregulated exit). Thuslycombined, movements produce in each region a geographical dynamic that holds, apart from naturaldeterminants, a fundamental role in the experience of being human on Earth.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,043 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,018 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».